• Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The future of AI has to be local and self-hosted. Soon enough you’ll have super powerful models that can run on your phone. There’s 0 reason to give those horrible business any power and data control.

    • yucandu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not to mention the one that I run locally on my GPU is trained on ethically-sourced data without breaking any copyright or data licensing laws, and yet it somehow works BETTER at ChatGPT for coding.

      • TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m having difficulty with getting off the ground with these. Primarily I don’t trust the companies or individuals involved. I’m hoping for open source, local, with a GUI for desktop use and an API for automation.

        What model do you use? And in what kind of framework?

        • Alloi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          R1 last i checked seems to be decent enough for a local model. customizable. but that was a while ago. its release temporarily crashed Nvidia stock because they showed how smart software design trumps mass spending on cutting edge hardware.

          at the end of the day its all of our data. we should own the means, especially if we built it by simply existing on the internet. without consent.

          if we wish to do this, its crucial that we do everything in our power to dismantle the “profit” structure and investment hype. sooner or later someone will leak the data, and we will have access to locally run versions we can train ourselves. as long as we dont allow them to monopolize hardware, we can have the brain, and the body of it run local.

          thats the only time it will be remotely ethical to use, unless its the persuit of attaining these goals.

          • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            right now you can use a Qwen-3-4B fine tuned model (Jan-v1-4B) with search tool and get even better results than Perplexity Pro, and this was 6 moths ago

                • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  So no advancements in qwen or perplexity in 6m and the January model is best…? Why are you doing what you say the AI do and just make shit up

                  • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    hmm I don’t think you did any resarch to prove that I’m wrong, you’re just making assumptions

                    but I like research so I don’t care I’ll spit the facts

                    1. Models not always improve by time, sometimes they regress: examples: gpt-5.2, grok-4, qwen-3-max… source
                    2. Qwen’s latest model (qwen-3-max-thinking) is worse than old model (qwen-3-max)
                    3. Perplexity was too busy with their browser and some UI they didn’t do any change on search itself source