• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Assuming he’s right (and boy, being sued by apple is a huge boost to his credibility), they’re keeping the stupid camera bump thing from the air???

    • scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The camera bump sure isn’t going away for a folding phone. cameras have fundamental volume requirements to maintain quality, if they don’t think they can justify making the normal iPhone thick enough to enclose the camera then there’s no way in hell they’ll think the folding phones doubled width can include it, if anything you’d expect it to be more prominent on a folding model

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      how do you propose removing it?

      there are two options, 1) using a smaller,shittier camera, or 2) making an extremely thick phone. neither option is very “apple”, especially for a flagship model.

      considering the vast majority of people use phone cases and will never notice the bump anyway, i think this whole thing is blown way out of proportion.

      • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No thicker than very popular and successful phones from just 5 years ago. They can use the extra space for a larger battery, so they dont have to nerf performance to maintain stability in older phones. They can also use the space to restore repairability.

        But probably not for a folding phone, since making both sides that thick will probably be too much.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I like the idea of a foldable phone but what I really want is a phone that folds enough to fit in my women’s pants pockets.

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can see you don’t spent much time with women.

        Women aren’t choosing pants with shitty pockets intentionally.

          • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re wrong about why women’s clothes don’t have pockets. Women were never given a choice to buy clothing with pockets.

            Initially, pockets were not accessible in women’s clothing due to the layers they were required to wear. After the suffragette movement when liberated women began to wear pants, designers intentionally kept pockets small to prop up the purse industry.

            Handbags are one of the most profitable items in the fashion industry.