• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Nobody in politics really cares for voters. They just tell convenient lies, and once you dropped your vote into the ballot box, you stop to exist for them again. You are just the annoying necessary means to lift them up to the pork barrels of political bribery.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because 90% think they’re in the top 10%, and the top 10% think they’re all 1 step from being the next musk.

    They’re all deluded be capitalism.

    • Binturong@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      We REALLY need to normalize demystifying the rebrand of bribery as ‘lobbying’. There’s a reason that term has power, cause people alreayd learned the dangers of it, and the corruption it breeds.

  • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because they’re using some of their money to keep us from holding them accountable? And that they have probably run the numbers to find that it is cheaper to do this than to just… Pay the taxes.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is this actually a legitimate question they’re asking?

    It’s the most obvious answer on earth. The people making the laws don’t work for the voters anymore. They vote for the donors.

    • rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It can be more complicated than that. My governor just signed into law a state income tax on anyone making a million or more. (We have no other income tax, everyone pays a regressive sales tax.) All the poorest people in the state are mad and they are collecting signatures to repeal the millionaire tax, because they think this new income tax will “trickle down” to anyone making $100k or less. They are absolutely convinced of this, even though new laws would have to be passed for that to happen. And this is a blue state.

  • nanometer1625@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Some things that would help:

    • A wealth tax. Their wealth will continue to grow exponentially, but at least a portion of it could be harvested to reduce the deficit.
    • Taxing capital gains the same as ordinary income. Making money from investments requires no effort, and it blows my mind that wage income is taxed more heavily.
    • MrGeneric@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trying to get exact numbers for wealth to tax it is near impossible especially in ultra wealthy areas with their own ways of hiding it Anyone who suggests touching capital gains will be accused of attacking peoples retirement at least in the US 401ks have replaced most other forms of retirement benefits

      Im surprised there aren’t more Georgists in this day and age when we have so much bogarted land and empty luxury apartments

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Summary since the Access top this page has been denied:

    Most Americans support higher taxes on billionaires due to concerns about inequality and concentrated wealth, yet federal and state efforts to implement such taxes have largely stalled because of political influence, legal complexity, and fears of capital flight (wealthy moving their money outside the US).

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Over 70% of voters want universal healthcare. About the same amount want a higher minimum wage.

    About 90% of Democratic voters want universal healthcare, more than half of all independents want the same thing, and even a huge amount of Republicans want universal healthcare (around 40%).

    Even so, D&Rs can’t be bothered.

    (yes yes, I know, BoTh SiDeS so I must be a secret Nazi bot, etc. you got me)

  • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is it so hard to reach consensus on Lemmy?

    Why do you support genocide?

    Why aren’t you just like me?

    • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s not the full answer though, since a similar phenomenon appears in much less oligarchic systems.

      While the rich also have a disproportionate influence in those systems, it wouldn’t be enough without the assistance of the racism and spite of the average voter.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why do we think they’re less oligarchic? It’s a classic principal-agent problem. Representatives are generally for sale.

            • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              An oligarchic system is one where political power lies predominantly in the hands of a small privileged elite. But it’s not a binary concept, the current US system is less oligarchic than it was in the 19th Century, or the Venetian Republic for example. What did you mean?