T. Hex

I thought the majority of their water consumption is indirect via electricity consumption. If we could stop burning freaking coal that would be a start.

But yes, also stop using potable water for evaporative cooling!!

“I’ve never seen him take a shit,” Rubio replied. “On the contrary, the guy doesn’t even have a butthole.”

You absolutely don’t need to wax all of them, where did you get that idea? It’s okay to only wax a few of them.

I felt utterly betrayed that they never explained the smoke monster!!!

“Fire dollar, hire ✨15✨ pennies”

Say that street A feeds into street B. Street A flows freely and is necessary for a different bus route. Street B is a bottleneck, both cars and buses pass through slowly.

If you remove a car lane from street B, the cars might back up into street A and impede both cars and buses that previously flowed freely through street A.

It’s a contrived example, but honestly I can think of a few places like this near me.

I realize now I shouldn’t have broached this topic in fuckcars 😂

Bus lanes have higher throughput of commuters than car lanes.

To play devil’s advocate…

Bus lanes having higher throughput doesn’t imply that it’s always the right choice to replace car lanes with bus lanes.

If the road was a major bottleneck for cars and this change made it even narrower, it could hurt throughput for both cars and buses!

Won’t future cyber pirates simply crack private keys by factoring primes on their quantum iPhones?

They’re usually the same PDF that’s designed for a giant paper menu, so I feel like I’m reading a huge document through a peephole.

A “responsive” website that reshapes the document to fit your screen size is usually a better experience. But I’ve certainly seen it done poorly and wished they hadn’t tried to be clever.

Please insert identity verification probe

No, you got it completely wrong. The first thing to do is remove the French language pack with rm -fr /.

Somehow it’s acceptable because a computer is involved. Imagine if the powers that be chose a physical method of obfuscation. Like, what if they said "we’ve decided you can only get this benefit you’re entitled to after flipping a coin to heads.

Obligatory Hot Fuzz: https://youtu.be/Cun-LZvOTdw

I’ve been waiting for this particular shoe to drop since 2016.

You need to look up what the word “nominally” means, it completely changes the meaning of the sentence you’re objecting to.

The best comments are “why” comments, the runner up is “how” comments if high-level enough, and maybe just don’t write “what” comments at all because everyone reading your code knows how to read code.