9WhiteTeeth

Wow, I take it back, absolute genius. Best cartoonists in the World.

deleted by creator

I mean, yeah?

EDIT: I want to elaborate b/c the situation is intentionally drawn to be generic so that it can use any text.

Think about this comic, what about the art would lead you to believe it has anything at all to do with oil? Nothing, but it fits just as well as just about anything else b/c it was designed specifically to be generic trash. That’s like my whole point, man.

Also, yeah, “guy walks into a bar” jokes are ass. Puns, too. I’m on the fence about puppies.

Sure, how about,

“We should have brought a bigger probe.”

Or how about,

“I guess we’ll see if they still fling their poop.”

Or for some topical flare, how about,

“You sure about this? These guys have a terrible reputation with aliens.”

All of these slightly change the context w/o the need to change the art.

I’m fairly certain a number of these cartoonists either “meal prep” a bunch of illustrations to caption later or maybe even sell the illustrations to the New Yorker who then have writers create the captions. I can’t say but imo it makes for bland cartoons 9 out of 10 times.

One thing I really dislike about New Yorker comics is the lazy, generic nature of the art that is totally divorced from the punchline.

For example, this shitty comic could literally have any caption & it would make no difference. They even have caption contests where readers can come up with punchlines

NY cartoons are factory farm trash fight me

206

I read somewhere (who knows where) Red Reader focuses on visual impaired accessibility features so Reddit Corp waives the api fees. I assume it’s cheaper for them than developing accessibility features into the official app.

The one on the right is Bibi, but the guy on the left I can’t place

Why are his teeth like that in the second photo? Did he get teeth tats? Are teeth tats a thing?

If this was Reddit this entire thread would be nuked. So refreshing!

I call him, “Rapey McRapenstein”.

Imagine the hundreds of fans that could be reached!

Some people just prefer the rip roaring hilarity of Gator Days ig

Polygon used to be great RIP

It’s Leo’s idea of a tank before they existed.

There is also a huge mostly ignored, Fascist Network in “religious” programming.

Try watching the 700 Club or the anything on the Trinity Broadcasting Network. Straight up White Nationalist Nazi propaganda running 24/7 completely unchallenged (likely tax free as well).

Two things, the experiment you are referring to was specifically designed to deceive whereas AI vulnerabilities would just be simple bugs.

Secondly, the security requirements of the Linux Kernel are way more important/stringent than Lutris, which has no special access & is often even further sandboxed if installed via Flatpak.

I just don’t see this as an issue until it proves to be one. People are always welcome to fork a “pure” version.

You are assuming the author is being unsafe & not auditing code for very basic security issues.

Let me present this angle, small teams of volunteer open source developers finally have a way to help ease the amount of code they produce, but you want them to continue doing all the work manually because AI hurts your feefees.

Further, you are openly declaring you don’t trust the devs to audit their own code.

If you can find a security vulnerability in the code (it is open source after all) I’ll cede, but otherwise, I think it is a good thing responsible AI use can help shoulder the work these folks do for our benefit.

Holy purity test I think people in this thread are slightly over reacting.