Not at all, but it would be a better answer than the hate you have responded with.
Not at all, but it would be a better answer than the hate you have responded with.
It’s a yes or no question
You still haven’t answered my question, your only responses have been attacks on my character and name calling. Is your stance so weak you can’t answer a simple question? Your name calling does nothing to hurt me but shows the darkness of your heart, I hope you get the help you need someday.
Clearly smarter than you. You’ve done nothing but insult me when I try to engage in good faith, everyone deserves equal protection under the law. Now if you’d kindly answer my question without sinking yo insults. Would you be fine with a men’s right conference banning women?
That isn’t an answer. I protested for BLM, just an FYI
Would you be just as fine with a men’s rights conference that banned women? Honest question


Scrapers for leather tanning too, the best material is still bone


Are we really surprised? This is the dipshit that suggests using nukes on people refusing gun buybacks


While I agree salted caramel isn’t great I can see why people like it, the ol salty sweet combo


Fanfic doesn’t count or you need to include all fanfiction. I don’t think we should break open that particular pandoras box just yet


Pattern recognition, this is how it starts


It’s giving me native boarding school vibes. First they separate you from your language and force you to use theirs


Why should I continue to lurk in spaces where I am a second class citizen?


Off the top of my head Opresser gets the idea across without suggesting a conspiracy by men as a gender to keep women repressed, as you said this state of being oppresses men just as it does women. You’d get more allies and less friction from the layperson if half aren’t subconsciously painted as minions and actors for the opressing class.


I’d use a genderless term, again to avoid alienating fence sitters and outsiders. Because people don’t like being associated with one if the greatest evils of society simply because they were born male. What is so fucking hard to understand about this?


Calling it the Patriarchy genders the oppressor, women in the same position do the same inhumane and cruel tactics to retain power as their male counterparts. Toxic Masculinity vs Internalized Misogyny is another, men are toxic actors while women who exhibit the same toxicity are treated as victims, the flagrant sexism I encounter in e ery feminist space I lurk in because as a man I am not allowed to speak. That’s my problem,the sheer utter hypocrisy. I will never understand how feminist thinkers can be so talented at recognizing the power of wording when it’s used against them but somehow become denser than a neutron star when it comes to seeing their own problematic and frankly hateful word choices


“It’s not named after men” “rule of the father” what gender is a father typically? I don’t see it as a battle of the sexes, it’s a battle for basic human empathy
Woah, careful with all that common sense and level minded thinking you might hurt somebody’s brain. Seriously though I agree with every word
Neat way to categorize those who don’t walk in lockstep with you as the enemy. I seek equality but refuse to be associated with a movement that sees me as a threat for my gender. Is your anger real or is it caused by cognitive dissonance trying hold egalitarian ideals in an inherently unegalitarian framework.
Shhh, batshit conspiracy theories are only bad if the wrong people say them.