They tried for the last 40 years, my friend.

If you read through the comments here you’ll see a ton of nuanced comments, I think undercutting your claim. At the same time, this is also an interesting issue because you’re trying to play the centrist role. But on this issue there is no centrist role, and actually you’ve just played the pro AI role while pretending you didn’t do that.

Because think about what happened. The developer used AI and it introduced bugs and that was bad for people. These are the facts. So the people are saying hey can you stop using AI and the developer is shrugging their shoulders.

What’s the middle ground that you’re looking for here? Recognizing that it’s possible to use AI harmlessly? But that’s not what happened. If it had been harmless used then no one would have brought up the issues in the first place.

And the garbage takes itself out.

And it may or may not be somewhat good. I think we’re seeing that shitty programmers use AI to write even shittier programs. And that will continue indefinitely.

The New York Times is partly responsible for this. The bullshit centrist coverage by mainstream media allowed the Democrats to shift to the right, which led to Hillary and her loss.

Lol except AI is stealing far fewer jobs than people said it would. Because they were liars. Because it’s a bubble that’s collapsing. And technology has always changed, jobs come and go.

Will he stay there? Please?

The bean counters will maximize their personal profit. You think they can’t game the AI bubble?

Oh look, finance has a friend in the other company. This is classic corruption: order shit from your friend’s business and pretend it was necessary.

Road rage is cultural, and it’s amazing how it changes from country to country. In some places you just don’t see it much, because it makes no sense.

I don’t know about taking back something I’ve said. I’ve said some pretty stupid and horrible things over the years, and that was pretty stupid and horrible of me. But, like, that’s reality, you know? The past is the baseline for the future.

That is also true, but it is expensive to implement.

Or maybe people are driving unsafely, as data in fact shows. Just a thought.

Any media that’s pretending to be honest needs to, if they’re going to quote Trump, either precede or proceed the quote with a disclaimer that he lies about everything. That’s basic integrity. Otherwise, you’re becoming the media that’s complicit.

I see no reason to listen to what that guy has to say on this topic. He’s only out for money and you can’t believe a word he says and he’s not an expert on it.

Um, do we have to go back and list idiotic leaders from the past fifth or a hundred years? We can do that easily enough… Takes time but isn’t hard.

He has no end game. Narcissists never do, because they aren’t losing, because they can’t, not in their own brains anyway.

If I were making tons of cash on AI speculation I would say that, too. Doesn’t make it accurate. Facts tell a different story.

Well no fucking shit. That the whole point, right?

It sounds like you never learned how to have small talk, and it’s possible to get through life without learning the skill, but it’s a lot easier if you take some time and practice it.

The reality is that sometimes you have to work together at work, and sometimes there’s bad things that happen, and it’s easier to get through those bad things if you are already accustomed to normally talking to a person for 1 to 2 minutes.

You don’t have to be their friend. You don’t have to like them. Nobody’s asking you to do either of those two things. But we are suggesting that learning to speak to people and hold conversations on ordinary topics is a useful skill in life. But you don’t need it! You can definitely get through life without it! But it’s hard to hold down certain jobs if you can’t talk to the people around you smoothly.