I would add to it that quantum computers are very specialized and as of now do not perform better at most conventional tasks.

So similar to APUs / NPUs, they might just be a very specialized PC part if they become available to the broader public at all.

Unfortunately a solid suggestion.

Yo wtf that’s mens rea / admission of guilt

They just admitted they knew it was bad and were like “but it’s legal in the US so it’s fine to send it there” but ignore it’s about as bad as it gets for legal symbols.

Here we go again

New palworld server boutta spawn on my network.

I assume it is mainly because his haircut and very pale skin used to be very unique and because his body language and facial expressions often does not match what people expect in a lot of public situations.

Unfortunately some of these things can also be explained by neurodiversity and people are projecting their personal grievances of Facebook/ meta onto that.

Too little too late. They made it clear that they don’t care about their users, their developers and now even their Cybersecurity researchers.

They made it well known that other humans are not appreciated in their vicinity.

I don’t have a solution but I wanna bump this question, I am invested now.

Make one?

Besides all the other things people listed, in law we appreciate that sexual violence is kind of worse than just physical violence, and if there’s power dynamics at play and psychological dependency, it gets even more morally apprehensive.

What I’m saying even just the sexual nature makes it worse for me, but of course there’s more.

That said, I did not know about what Mark Wahlberg did, and obviously not great.

Be worried about why he had to hide it, and be genuinely curious about how he became rich. I dunno if I’d be confident enough to ask about it though, I’d probably just tell him that I’m sorry he had to hide it and I hope he knows it doesn’t change how I see him.

Literally have a few friends who are rich, but it doesn’t change anything. I’m still a little brokey and we still alternate between me and them paying for dinner.

Yeah what a waste of good shit

If the VPN is for phoning home, of course there’s free client and server software.

But if it’s for spoofing a different location, you either get found out, or you have to pay.

I wanna live in a world where I do not pay for anything but there is stuff that you can only really get if you pay.

I got no sources, but I’ve regularly heard people claim that depression and similar mental health issues have an equal or worse health impact than smoking or other “soft” drug abuse.

I mean it’s a metric. Not a perfect one, but it helps to get an overview of the state of a repository.

Unfortunately, I hope at some point this just becomes normal.

I talked to some friends and they told me so much about back issues because of chest weight, and I started putting two and two together as to why women usually don’t run regularly and things like that and I gained even more respect for when they do.

It’s so cool to see women entering men’s spaces and being undeniably good at it.

You don’t call yourself a Nazi for your open mindedness. Of course you can talk to them to understand their perspective but if someone asks, I call it what it is: a deeply troubling ideology.

Should we ask questions if they’re clearly rhetorical?

First the direct answer: you can’t.

Some more context: there’s usually ways to deal with this issue. There’s voir dire for example, where you can do a practice run of the questions and answers for a specific witness, or the party can profer (idk if it’s spelled correctly) the testimony, giving the judge a general idea of the direct or cross-examination.

This usually only happens if something goes wrong. It can be things like the lawyer overstepping a boundary by accident, but it’s very frowned upon and they can be admonished and sanctioned by the judge.

For why to do about the “can’t put the shit back in the horse”, usually the judge gives the jury an admonishment and maybe even a curative instruction right before deliberation, but best case scenario it’s been handled in advance and doesn’t even happen.

Basically the idea is to keep the jury “as clean as possible in their decision”. Best case they only hear the stuff that’s relevant, but any other case you try to tell them to disregard things or remind them what to consider, and you hope they feel duty-bound to uphold this.

Generally it is understood that juries take their obligation extremely seriously and most of the time they genuinely make an effort to rule out evidence that shouldn’t have come in. Of course there are outliers.

I make dubstep so I feel so this hurts my soul in a one two punch combo.