✺roguetrick✺

we are not building a central face database

I honestly cannot understand why the parent company of Facebook would actually release such a parody sounding response

There’s always tons of carveouts on these bills because companies have been doing this since forever. Now it’s just automated. Screwing people over with information asymmetry is older than Adam Smith.

She divorced him.

Kay Ivey is twice divorced with no children.

Listen, I’m not being judgemental about what you do with your cloaca. I don’t understand the thing in the first place.

People not finding someone writing an essay in response to being annoyed at people sending them irrelevant essays funny is acceptable enough to me. I don’t care if people don’t share my humor. The absolute wall of defensive text I’ve received in response is also funny, in a discussion about an essay about the value of brevity. And so is the idea that any of this is pro AI while people complain I have a reading comprehension issue. I can also assure you the irony of how much I’ve typed is also not lost on me. Frankly this thread is about to produce a singularity of irony.

I’m not declaring it exactly equivalent or anything, and what you said I find valid. The irony lies in what you said, that’s all. It’s a concept that can easily be explained in a sentence and is suggested to be posted wherever someone else posts an inappropriate AI essay. It’s just funny in the common situational ironic sense to me. People arguing that I shouldn’t find it ironically funny is bizarre to me. But also funny for other reasons.

I’m saying the author is writing an essay for a concept that can easily be understood in a sentence, yes. And I find it ironic. Not bad, just funny. And somehow this offends people.

I’m aware.

Yes, it’s direct structured writing supported by examples. I’m not saying it’s a bad essay, it’s just a funny thing to read an essay about how reading AI essays wastes the readers time.

Oh there’s plenty of funny stuff going on and it’s not like the downvotes matter. I mean that poster using Socratic irony to tell me why I found something ironically funny was wrong was amusing in itself if incredibly tedious.

No, I don’t believe I said that either. Are there any other things I didn’t say you wanted to go over?

Dunno either way, it was just his direct quote where he described the felony as “low level” which was funny to me. Generally any felony is quite disqualifying for these corps arguing that’s unreasonable is quite a hill to climb.

I don’t consider it unreasonable, it’s just a funny juxtaposition because the format resembles AI output.

I didn’t. The thesis is AI essays in inappropriate medium is bad. And it’s an essay.

Really though, I find it ironic as fuck to write an essay about how you shouldn’t post essays in inappropriate places.

low-level felony

I very much am against discrimination of anybody who has contact with our criminal justice system, but still, lol.

Funny stuff. Realize these chloroplasts themselves are organelles that derived from some bacteria some plant ancestor took on much like mitochondria are. So we’re not just taking stuff from plants here, we’re creating a retina in the most ass backwards way we could.

Be nice if they just made the damn things rebuildable with oem cells. They’re usually just spot welded packs of 18650 batteries. Cheap as shit by comparison.

A Berkshire Hathaway company. Thanks Warren.