• justdaveisfine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I once played with a DM that strictly ruled that rogues didn’t get a sneak attack bonus unless I was in stealth and undetected by the enemy. (As he said its in the name: SNEAK attack)

    I brought up I could probably make that still work with a bow and I was immediately preemptively banned from using ranged weapons lol.

    That was a frustrating game.

      • cjoll4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        To me it sounds just like AD&D 2e rules, in which the ability was called “Backstabbing.”

    • Brutticus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been hearing about DM’s complaining about Rogues SA since 3.x days. These are the same guys who (allegedly) thought the monk was more powerful that the sorcerer because the monk’s chart had so many more columns and class features.

      Why did you even play with this guy?

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had a dm once say he was thinking about saying no about my rogue’s “I shoot, move, bonus action hide around the corner” loop. But then he said he realized if he said no, my character would suck and it’d be no fun.

    I think that was the right call.

    • jounniy@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Very much this. It even feels very “rogueish” to employ that strategy and it’s far from broken, so I don’t see why you would ban it.