I really wish we had a thing that does what I’m told it does. I think that would be cool. The weird fanatical pretending and cherry picking really gets to me. So much worse than it was with the equally useful nft’s
Even if these real examples were cherry-picked - they’re still real examples. In these cases, it did the thing. That success will be pursued, expanded, and streamlined, so it is more likely to do the thing. Comparisons to an outright scam are nonsense because this demonstrably functions.
It does not prove merit. Sorry. I don’t trust any ‘accomplishment’ of these systems in a field I do not understand thoroughly after being told about all their accomplishments in fields I did understand thoroughly that were bullshit pushed by people who only vaguely kind of understood what they were saying and were mostly wrong. Too many bullshit liars and cherry picking fanatics who understand nothing. Poisoned well.
Everything I can verify in support of your point from people on your side of this debate is spectacular obvious bullshit that falls apart the moment I actually look.
I just don’t trust lying liars who tell spectacular bullshit lies to not be lying when I don’t have the expertise to check.
Only works when what you want is surface bullshit. Because it makes surface bullshit. I guess uses for surface bullshit.
I know my software engineer compsci degree friends say its not helpful and has rendered actual resources useless. I’m going to trust general statements from experts I know over things from the sycophantic cultists of the bullshit pump that I cannot verify
Again: python schism, hardware integration, Minecraft wizard math. Insulting people who politely explain counterexamples won’t make those counterexamples disappear. It’s just sticking your fingers in your ears until they touch.
Reality is not defined by interpersonal trust, or by denial.
Lying liars lie. I know they lie. I have verified they lie about other things. Constantly and boldly. This looks on surface like their other lies but on a subject I don’t know about.
I shouldn’t even bitber to verify given total lack of credibility I’m more likely to believe a thing the current potus says is truth than one if you
But I did ask experts I know know this stuff and I know aren’t actively lying to me and they say they haven’t found good uses like this it can’t do similar tasks and breaks the tools they used to use by being lying and bad so I don’t believe you safe to assume so you are either lying or amplifying a lie because you want to believe
I really wish we had a thing that does what I’m told it does. I think that would be cool. The weird fanatical pretending and cherry picking really gets to me. So much worse than it was with the equally useful nft’s
Fingers in ears is not an argument.
Even if these real examples were cherry-picked - they’re still real examples. In these cases, it did the thing. That success will be pursued, expanded, and streamlined, so it is more likely to do the thing. Comparisons to an outright scam are nonsense because this demonstrably functions.
It does not prove merit. Sorry. I don’t trust any ‘accomplishment’ of these systems in a field I do not understand thoroughly after being told about all their accomplishments in fields I did understand thoroughly that were bullshit pushed by people who only vaguely kind of understood what they were saying and were mostly wrong. Too many bullshit liars and cherry picking fanatics who understand nothing. Poisoned well.
Facts aren’t real because scams exist. Sure, dude.
I just don’t trust your shit and cannot verify.
Everything I can verify in support of your point from people on your side of this debate is spectacular obvious bullshit that falls apart the moment I actually look.
I just don’t trust lying liars who tell spectacular bullshit lies to not be lying when I don’t have the expertise to check.
Spectacular bullshit like ‘it kinda works sometimes.’
Only works when what you want is surface bullshit. Because it makes surface bullshit. I guess uses for surface bullshit.
I know my software engineer compsci degree friends say its not helpful and has rendered actual resources useless. I’m going to trust general statements from experts I know over things from the sycophantic cultists of the bullshit pump that I cannot verify
Again: python schism, hardware integration, Minecraft wizard math. Insulting people who politely explain counterexamples won’t make those counterexamples disappear. It’s just sticking your fingers in your ears until they touch.
Reality is not defined by interpersonal trust, or by denial.
Lying liars lie. I know they lie. I have verified they lie about other things. Constantly and boldly. This looks on surface like their other lies but on a subject I don’t know about.
I shouldn’t even bitber to verify given total lack of credibility I’m more likely to believe a thing the current potus says is truth than one if you
But I did ask experts I know know this stuff and I know aren’t actively lying to me and they say they haven’t found good uses like this it can’t do similar tasks and breaks the tools they used to use by being lying and bad so I don’t believe you safe to assume so you are either lying or amplifying a lie because you want to believe