This is conservatism. This is rejecting facts to place belief in persons. You have an ingroup that’s automatically right and smart and handsome, and an outgroup that’s wrong no matter what evidence they point to, and anyone saying what you already disagree with must be that outgroup. I’m not just ‘some fucker online,’ I’m ‘one of you.’
If words don’t matter to you, why bother to speak?
They’re not automatically right they’re just not proven constant bold faced liars. Who in every space I can check are lies. I do not trust you because you support the same claims as known liars that support an agenda known for lying. You are not some fucker online. You are showing you believe lying liars who lie then telling me a thing I cannot confirm is true is true. Why would I believe it.
A suspected lying liar who lies made a aim I could not check myself. A claim based on what I know about how these systems work is at the very least a strong read of facts if not an outright lie like all the claims I could look deeply at were. I went to experts who could confirm and they said what amounted to ‘basically no’. I literally did research with qualified credentialed experts who I trust who went to college about this and do it for rent money who I know know things because I have hired them or worked with them and they were super helpful and good at the thing. Multiple of them. I checked with multiple experts. Last time I bother wasting everyone’s time. You are in a cult.
Are you using an LLM for this repetitive finger-pointing?
Trust is not a factor. Claims are evaluated. But you aggressively do not want more detail about any specific fact; you pre-emptively dismiss any contrary evidence as “cherry-picking.”
There is no everyone here. It’s just you and me and you want to blather without listening.
I checked. I couldn’t verify deeper myself no domain expertise I went to people who I knew could and they confirmed it was not an indicator of general utility I’m sorry you can’t deal withypur lies not being believed I’m sure you put a lot of work into them it must not feel very good and I’m sorry all that work was wasted
‘My friend Steve-Dave says nuh uh, and I believe him over my own lying eyes. So unless you dogmatically agree it’s completely worthless, you’re in a cult.’
I so not have the expertise to understand what what I’m seeing means.
I asked someone who does someone with a degree in what you say it is whose domain knowledge I have made successful use of in the past who I trust to speak honestly and not be reactionary two if them if it matters
Are you saying experts and asking experts isn’t valid I don’t understand
Did you ask someone about this, specifically, during this conversation? Or did you just ask someone about the general topic, at some point in the past, and parrot that conclusion at a stranger seven times in a row? Because the experience on my end looks a lot closer to the latter.
Can I speak to your friend who understands this subject you can’t shut up about?
This is conservatism. This is rejecting facts to place belief in persons. You have an ingroup that’s automatically right and smart and handsome, and an outgroup that’s wrong no matter what evidence they point to, and anyone saying what you already disagree with must be that outgroup. I’m not just ‘some fucker online,’ I’m ‘one of you.’
If words don’t matter to you, why bother to speak?
They’re not automatically right they’re just not proven constant bold faced liars. Who in every space I can check are lies. I do not trust you because you support the same claims as known liars that support an agenda known for lying. You are not some fucker online. You are showing you believe lying liars who lie then telling me a thing I cannot confirm is true is true. Why would I believe it.
A suspected lying liar who lies made a aim I could not check myself. A claim based on what I know about how these systems work is at the very least a strong read of facts if not an outright lie like all the claims I could look deeply at were. I went to experts who could confirm and they said what amounted to ‘basically no’. I literally did research with qualified credentialed experts who I trust who went to college about this and do it for rent money who I know know things because I have hired them or worked with them and they were super helpful and good at the thing. Multiple of them. I checked with multiple experts. Last time I bother wasting everyone’s time. You are in a cult.
Are you using an LLM for this repetitive finger-pointing?
Trust is not a factor. Claims are evaluated. But you aggressively do not want more detail about any specific fact; you pre-emptively dismiss any contrary evidence as “cherry-picking.”
There is no everyone here. It’s just you and me and you want to blather without listening.
I checked. I couldn’t verify deeper myself no domain expertise I went to people who I knew could and they confirmed it was not an indicator of general utility I’m sorry you can’t deal withypur lies not being believed I’m sure you put a lot of work into them it must not feel very good and I’m sorry all that work was wasted
Troll harder.
Your mom is…harder?
I feel like that’s good enough.
‘My friend Steve-Dave says nuh uh, and I believe him over my own lying eyes. So unless you dogmatically agree it’s completely worthless, you’re in a cult.’
Pest.
I so not have the expertise to understand what what I’m seeing means.
I asked someone who does someone with a degree in what you say it is whose domain knowledge I have made successful use of in the past who I trust to speak honestly and not be reactionary two if them if it matters
Are you saying experts and asking experts isn’t valid I don’t understand
Did you ask someone about this, specifically, during this conversation? Or did you just ask someone about the general topic, at some point in the past, and parrot that conclusion at a stranger seven times in a row? Because the experience on my end looks a lot closer to the latter.
Can I speak to your friend who understands this subject you can’t shut up about?