- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
“What educators, parents and policy officials really needed was high quality data and evidence to help guide them. What they have had to deal with instead is some substandard research.”
Archived version: https://archive.is/20260504182905/https://www.404media.co/nature-retracts-paper-on-the-benefits-of-chatgpt-in-education/
Interesting choice to use an LLM for a simple websearch and post the whole output in a Fuck AI community
It’s a bold strategy Cotton, let’s see if that works out for them
Simple web search just yields ads these days.
They’re tools.
Not perfect, but one hell of alot better than regular-search, much of the time.
Feel free to downvote everything I ever say ( or have an LLM do it, if you want ), if that validity-isn’t-collective-it-is-individual-content preference-of-granularity.
( same as with humans: anybody who says they’re inherently-right because they’re zionist/christofascist/islamist/fascist can go eat rocks:
validity is of individual-uprightness, not “inherent” on one’s “group-membership”.
Some individuals are monsters, some saints, but all humans are humans, & the granularity-of-judging has to be fine )
_ /\ _
Yeah, but honestly Google search is crap these days. I use DDG but it’s not a lot better.