The position puts her at odds with some on the left, such as Rep. Ro Khanna, another potential 2028 contender, who said he wants to find “common ground” with people like Greene.

In a conversation Friday at the University of Chicago Institute of Politics moderated by David Axelrod, the onetime political strategist to President Barack Obama, a student asked Ocasio-Cortez whether she stood by past remarks that there were “legitimate white supremacist sympathizers at the core of the House of Representatives caucus” and, if so, why she worked with some of them.

Ocasio-Cortez did stand by them and said she wasn’t scared of reaching across the aisle, holding up her work with Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn. But she set a clear boundary.

“I personally do not trust someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene, a proven bigot and antisemite, on the issue of what is good for Gazans and Israelis,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “I don’t think it benefits our movement in that instance to align the left with white nationalists. I don’t think it serves us.”

    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I’d think it would be obvious as a general principle, and I’m kind of surprised that AOC’s position is more strict: Don’t trust MTG on Gaza or Israel.

      • Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Should just be in general for sure. But i feel like people dont realize that MTG is just against israel becausing she is a raging racist who thinks the jewish cabal is running the world with space lasers.

    • slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      What’s obvious to me is that our president is a pedophile and a x34 felon. Saying something is obvious, doesn’t take away the possibilities. We live in a post-truth society where the idiot who screams the loudest has the most listeners.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      She hasn’t changed. She joined MAGA for greedy and selfish reason, and she left for the same reasons. She will knife anyone left of her in the back the moment it becomes benificial.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Marjorie Taylor Greene is bat shit insane, or at least she doesn’t mind acting like it. She is as untrustworthy as any lying reality denying MAGA idiot.

  • Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I think MTG is the republican party hedging their bets

    They know they are going to suffer the biggest landslide in history at the next election, they elected a conman and openly conned the country.

    If MTG offers a softer more dem-lite vision then she may well take some of the floaters, Indies and undecideds. The GOP won’t be able to campaign with trump politics so they will need to mirror the democrats to win a few votes.

    • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      You are overconfident. The shock and awe on Reddit when Trump won last election was palpable. After months of reading Democrat puff pieces, the users were left dazed and confused. They didn’t understand how it was physically possible.

      In truth, Trump was elected because he had popular policies. He has and is continuing to makes moves that help a large swathe of the public. Democrats need to pull to the center if they want to win. They need to avoid or counter the two issues that were the focus of Republican marketing spending.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        The only “help” he gives the public is the ability to be openly hateful without fear of social backlash.

        • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          …this isn’t true. He focused heavily on the working class with policies such as immigration and the reduction of overtime taxes.

          These are people that would have traditionally voted Democrat. He somehow managed to swing the election without marginalizing middle and upper class voters. This is surprising; the upper classes benefit disproportionately from increased immigration.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            The focus on immigration has resulted in massive losses for the agriculture industry, driving up food prices and putting small farms out of business. So much for the working class. Not to mention all the tariffs making everything else less affordable.

            His messaging may promise sunshine and rainbows for the average American but his actual impacts in office have been nothing short of catastrophic. The people who still buy into the messaging are morons, bigots, and the willfully ignorant making a quick buck.

  • Beans@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I look at what is happening with Greene and can’t help but think of this as something akin to cancel culture. While I align closer with AOC than MTG, I’m not sure distancing yourself from somebody like Greene - who has genuinely started changing their views despite her Bill Burr style rhetoric stating she’s not changing and has always thought like this - is helpful to your cause. I think it could do a few things like alienate potential partners, keep Greene from moving closer to you on the spectrum, etc. and none of them are particularly good.

    I think all we can really do is welcome Greene over with open arms. Now, I’m tempered because I’m not sure she will shift any farther than where she is now, but I think alienating her is a good way to keep her as your enemy. And I don’t need more of those. Frankly, I applaud Green for this last year she’s spent in the ire of Trump. It take courage to speak out. And now that she is speaking out we want to alienate her? I don’t like that, even knowing that welcoming her over will come with a lot of strain.

    • musicalphysics@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      MTG is currently going around telling people to take invermectin for the Hanta virus. MTG’s brief period of sanity is already well over.

    • iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yeah not much difference betweem the two of them huh? It’s a fuckin act she is pulling. How the fuck you even remotely have anything close to mtg says you might need some personal reflection

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Yeah, fuck that noise and fuck her too. You can go ahead and pat her on the back for doing the bare fucking minimum and nothing will change.

  • CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    No shit, Sherlock. I’m not mad at AOC for stating the obvious. I’m mad that she has to in the first place cos Democrats are fucking stupid. Not as stupid as Republicans, but still stupid.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Their apologists just don’t get it as well. Dems need to stop talking big and be big. Stop saying you’re the resistance and not verbally flogging the people who vote Trump appointees or funding of ICE. They need to stop portraying themselves as a weak party against the Republicans.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    You don’t have to trust MTG in order to work with her across the aisle to sign legislation putting an end to funding Israeli genocide. The two things can be true together.

    This is an infuriatingly divisive lib take by AOC, and sadly further evidence she’s just not ready for a presidential run. I truly hope she reconsiders and goes after Chucklefuck’s senate seat instead, it would do way more good for the movement that way.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      It’s honestly both striking and funny to me that someone who had denounced Harris under this same purity test now suddenly is saying the left should work with fascists because there is common ground.

      lol wow. Just wow.

      I guess that’s single-issue tankies for you.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Ok well MTG isn’t running for president, nor would I vote for her if she did because like AOC, I don’t trust her at all.

        However, when she drafted a bill to reduce aid to Israel by 500mil, AOC voted against it. AOC claims she is about results, but then does her own purity tests like this which further enable genocide. It is damaging, divisive, and disingenuous of her to do so.

    • KnitWit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      MTG is no longer in congress, so there is no reaching across the aisle to sign legislation. She quit literally the day her pension became vested.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        MTG was in congress when she drafted a bill to reduce military aid to Israel, and AOC voted against it.

        • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          So I take then you know that was the only issue the bill addressed, with no riders, so you’re certain it should have passed. The MTG bill definitely didn’t fund any wacko conservative garbage, right?

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Well, no. Pretty much the only bills that get passed in modern era Congress are omnibus budget bills. MTG’s Israeli funding reduction was a specific amendment to one such bill, which AOC chose to vote against.

            I’m sure the rest of what got passed had all sorts of whacko conservative garbage within, because they control the entire federal government at this time. This is likely partially why AOC voted against the actual bill as well.

            That said, if you consider Israeli control of the US government an existential threat, which I do, then that makes it even more important to find opportunities to work with the conservatives in power to curtail Israel’s influence, which MTG’s amendment would have done.

            AOC could have had her cake and eaten it too, by voting to pass the amendment to remove some funding to Israel, and then casting a performative nay vote for the overall budget bill.

            So yeah, I’m disappointed that she chose partisan politics above achieving an impactful, measurable result. But that’s liberals for you. The only reason I care is because I hold AOC to a higher standard than most of them, because she is by far the closest to representing my own values in terms of her actual voting record and what she claims to believe in.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          To other users reading this: This user tends to argue in bad faith and I’d advise tagging them accordingly, but I’ll just clarify for the record:

          AOC voted against that bill because it actually enabled offensive bombs to continue while gutting defensive Iron Dome measures. AOC has long been a proponent of defensive measures that protect civilian life, independent of national flags. However, given the latest number of loopholes that Israel has used, AOC has as of April 1st adjusted her position to refuse ALL military aid to Israel.

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            Cash is fungible. Israel doesn’t care what it’s earmarked for, giving them money further enables the genocide. The important thing is that the US attempt to apply leverage by reducing what we give them.

            My positions on Israeli genocide and the shameful involvement of the US, due to our government being captured wholly by Israel, have been consistent throughout.

            It’s funny you make this claim however. The bad faith argument was from AOC claiming that she had to vote no because of offensive weaponry, when in fact she did so because her esteemed colleagues told her to heel. After the vote, she changes her position. Interesting.

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              In fact she did so because her esteemed colleagues told her to heel. After the vote, she changes her position. Interesting.

              Speculative.

              • crusa187@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                Perhaps. But just to put a fine point on this matter - I am glad that AOC came around to the correct position on whether we should continue funding the terrorist nation state of Israel, in that we absolutely should not. They are literally using this money to buy off our politicians so that they don’t work for us, instead they work for Israel. It’s wrong in every possible way.

                I sincerely hope this is how AOC will vote regarding bankrolling Israel in the future, regardless of whether the authors of said bills have an R next to their name, or whether she perceives them to be a hypothetical future opponent in a presidential race.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    So she was willing to endorse Joe Biden at the peak of the genocide but working with a Republican goes too far? Can it be any clearer AOC is a grifter?

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        More like president for Israel, and he did it for free. They didn’t even have Epstein files on him, he just did it for the love of Zionism.