• workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s another problem which is that you can only donate about $104,000 to a federal candidate’s campaign but you are allowed to independently campaign for that politician using unlimited funds. Third party campaigning shouldn’t be allowed. It’s been ruled a matter of free speech, that if Michael Moore wanted to make a documentary critiquing health care in the US, that is his right. But some people will make documentaries filled with lies. It might be difficult to control what wealthy people do with their money and what they say, but that doesn’t mean you can’t try.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      People down voting me must be missing the point I’m trying to make. Even if citizens united is negated it only limits spending by corporations. People would still be able to spend unlimited funds campaigning for the politician they support, they would just have to do it as an individual. Example: Elon Musk would still be able to use his wealth and X platform to sway votes toward his candidate