beep@piefed.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoU.S. employers spend roughly $1.7 billion annually on union avoidancewww.epi.orgexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkU.S. employers spend roughly $1.7 billion annually on union avoidancewww.epi.orgbeep@piefed.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareBuffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoWhich is exactly why unions need to be legally protected. The power balance between employer and employee is not equal.
minus-squarenixFREAK@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoUnions need to be mandatory and amended
minus-squarepticrix@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoWhoa there, Nelly. Have you thought about those poor people in the union avoidance industry? You want to take their bread and butter and third homes? What about the GDP, did you think about the GDP?
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month ago What about the GDP, did you think about the GDP? Money actually moving around the economy grows the GDP. Money accumulating at the top actually slows economic expansion.
Which is exactly why unions need to be legally protected.
The power balance between employer and employee is not equal.
Unions need to be mandatory and amended
Whoa there, Nelly. Have you thought about those poor people in the union avoidance industry? You want to take their bread and butter and third homes? What about the GDP, did you think about the GDP?
Money actually moving around the economy grows the GDP. Money accumulating at the top actually slows economic expansion.