What started as a widely backed proposal to locate a new Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum on the National Mall devolved into a partisan fight Thursday after Republicans revised the legislation to ensure no transgender people are included in the exhibits.
The House rejected the bill, 204-216, an outcome that leaves the next steps uncertain. The revised bill also would ban a “diversity” of views and give President Donald Trump the final say on where the museum would be located.
“It was a simple bill. You kind of ruined it with your trans obsession and your culture wars,” Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, a Democrat from New Mexico and chair of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, said earlier in the week.
But Republicans argued it was Democrats who were overreacting to the changes and now threatening progress toward establishing the long-sought women’s museum in the nation’s capital.
Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York, the bill’s chief sponsor, said “it’s a disgrace” that Democrats would be standing in the way of the bill’s passage.
“Perhaps the party that is opposing a women’s history museum on the National Mall because they want to have transgender exhibits — maybe they are the ones who are trans obsessed,” Malliotakis said.
In the final tally, a handful of Republicans voted against the bill, joining Democrats who led the opposition. The chamber came to a standstill as GOP leaders scrounged for support from their ranks.



Ok. I’ve litterally never had a bad word to say about trans people. You do you boo. However, this is like having a black history museum and then blocking it because Asians weren’t part of it. Make a trans history museum. You could have exhibits that go all the way back to 2005. Lmao
Hmm yes a “separate but equal” museum what a great non bigoted idea.
Fair enough. I too think a women’s museum is unnecessarily gendered. But these are the times we live in. Lost is the age of the melting pot, now it’s all about the individual.
You just said that the “12” trans people are “attention seeking”, and then in this very post are trying to claim that trans people have only been around since 2005. We’ve been around the entire time, we just get shit on by transphobic idiots like yourself and minimized by history.
Never had a bad word to say my ass, you’re pathetic.
I guess so. You’re overly sensitive. Cheers!
Just a guess: Are a lot of people in your life overly sensitive?
Lmao nope! Most are down to earth regular people. You ever have conversations offline?
I have a hard time believing someone with these social deficiencies has a low friction social life.
Well if everyone in their life is as big an asshole as they are, their social life may indeed be well-lubricated…
Lmao. Welp. I’d love for you to see it. The trick, I’ve learned, is not really getting upset, and enjoying the time with people, regardless of their background.
I say this meaning being chill when they are a super conservative asshole, still shake their hand, make them feel like you care, and then forget them easily.
This is a bad analogy, and it shows that you are either not paying attention to the facts are are a troll.
It would be closer to saying that, by a Republican amended law, Asians aren’t allowed in the new black history Museum.
And you would say that is wrong?
It would mean that anyone that is black and also has Asian heritage would not be allowed to be in the museum. So yeah, it would be a bad rule to add at the last second for no reason outside of bigotry.
Nah. I think it would be anyone that is Asian but “feels” black. Wutang would have a whole wing if it were reversed.
Thanks for confirming what your tag should be.
Hell yes! I’ll add it to my LinkedIn!