FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 18 days agodays of future pastlemmy.caimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1663arrow-down116file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1647arrow-down1imagedays of future pastlemmy.caFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 18 days agomessage-square52fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareSparroHawc@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·18 days agoIf they’re only a couple meters wide, how the heck are they supposed to fit watercraft?
minus-squareWalleyeWarrior@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·18 days agoThe barges were just a little less than a few meters wide. The manpower to build a 100km long canal that is 2.5-3 meters wide is substantially less than what it takes to dig one 8 meters wide in the era before steam shovels.
If they’re only a couple meters wide, how the heck are they supposed to fit watercraft?
The barges were just a little less than a few meters wide. The manpower to build a 100km long canal that is 2.5-3 meters wide is substantially less than what it takes to dig one 8 meters wide in the era before steam shovels.