The subtitle of the article says “some argue child marriage bans would increase abortion”

The person who wrote the article can die too (figuratively I mean. Like their career dying).

When the subtitle of your article just states the opinions of pedophiles you’re a piece of shit too. They are saying the opinions like they have some form of merit enough to stand alone as the subtitle. Maybe the opinions of the victims of child rapist should be your subtitle? Something like: They are “concerned” about maintaining the law that a child, that was raped, is treated as a murderer unless they marry their rapist. That’s what that subtitle SHOULD be.

I’m so tired of “stating passive opinions” not being treated for the fundamental bias they already have baked in.

It’s awful journalism and the author is just allowing the language of pedophiles to be normalized.

So, yeah. I know you were probably just joking with your comment. But I saw it as an opportunity to vent my frustration. Especially, with the mods trying to enforce the awful passive language title this article has in the first place.