return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 days agoThe fossil fuel primary: Why Chevron and PG&E are spending millions to boost Becerrasfstandard.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThe fossil fuel primary: Why Chevron and PG&E are spending millions to boost Becerrasfstandard.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoReviewing tomorrow slate for California… JFC California this is the best you could do? Fucking crazy good candidates coming up ALL over the nation and this is what you’ve come up with?
minus-squarelolo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoC’mon, didn’t you hear? There’s a “progressive billionaire” in the race (that this publication seems to want elected). So we’re probably all good.
minus-squaredondelelcaro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoThere are better candidates on the ballot, but money and strategic voting because of FPTP make some of those candidates less likely to be elected. This isn’t an issue unique to California.
minus-squarevery_well_lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoAt this point it’s basically impossible to interpret the Democrats’ overall strategy as anything other than intentional sabotage.
Reviewing tomorrow slate for California…
JFC California this is the best you could do? Fucking crazy good candidates coming up ALL over the nation and this is what you’ve come up with?
C’mon, didn’t you hear? There’s a “progressive billionaire” in the race (that this publication seems to want elected). So we’re probably all good.
There are better candidates on the ballot, but money and strategic voting because of FPTP make some of those candidates less likely to be elected. This isn’t an issue unique to California.
At this point it’s basically impossible to interpret the Democrats’ overall strategy as anything other than intentional sabotage.