• orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    The worst is when rich people interview other rich people about their rich person thing (e.g. Ivanka Trump purchasing an island), so that poor people can watch it on television. That level of narcissism and arrogance is just fucking astonishing to me. You can be rich and also just shut the absolute fuck up about it.

    • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seeing some of the wealthy crying on camera, saying they’ll flee because of a tax, that it’s a nightmare scenario, that it’s akin to a racist slur to tax the rich…

      On an unrelated note, did you know that during the french revolution, guillotines were used?

    • jafra@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t get it either bit poor people even love to watch this, thinking rich people are still normal people with normal problems… Lets not forget though that rich people are not our main concern. It’s the obscenely rich people that need some obscene defunding.

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    how much money does google make? billions of dollars a year

    most of it comes from manipulating your opinion, one way or another.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    My eyes were practically bleeding while watching some local news coverage at a bar, fairly recently.

    It was literally two geriatric fascists in cowboy hats yelling at each other over the image of a young black man with facial tattoos in an orange prison jumpsuit. The debate was whether the local PD had gone woke and become complicit in street crime or just needed another zillion dollars of additional funding to fight the urban menace.

  • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sports coverage is not news; there’s always a sports segment in every ‘news’ program. Entertainment masquerading as news. Kill Rupert Murdoch and his progeny.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    this makes me sad because newspaper people are not rich at all

    city desk editors and reporters and photojournalist and fact checkers are poverty wage jobs.

    they are not the rich.

  • skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The existence of “Earned Media” implies and proves the existence of “Unearned Media” (the rich and privileged paying other rich and privileged people)

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      If we discarded every source that had a liberal or capitalist slant, we would effectively have to stop reading 99% of Western media, and we’d be blinding ourselves to the narrative of the ruling class. We are adults with functioning brains and the capacity for critical analysis. We should be able to read a piece of liberal slop, identify the ideological framing, strip it away, and analyze the material conditions they are reporting on or trying to obscure.

      You need to read the Wall Street Journal because it is the mouthpiece of the ruling class that tells you exactly what capital is thinking, what they are afraid of, and how they are strategizing to protect their interests. You cannot effectively dismantle an argument if you refuse to understand its internal structure and logic.

      Running away from information because it doesn’t align with their worldview is what liberals do when they retreat into their MSNBC bubbles. We should be secure enough in our own position to read sources we abhor, understand them, and approach their claims from a position of knowledge. Ruthless criticism of all that exists includes reading sources like the wsj.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Reuters

      reuters is not as neutral as you seem to think it is. i’ve seen people name the associated press too, but they are just as representative of bourgeois interests.

          • Gal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            2 days ago

            The socialist who posts a lot of news posts this. It’s not really that hard of a joke to get

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yogthos isn’t telling poor people to blame each other, but that the working classes need to collectively fight the bourgeoisie.

                • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  “news” could be any new information over any medium and is as old as language and gossip and culture itself

                  The News™ is a manufactured product designed to control the masses

                  Are you suggesting we should just never post or discuss either?