• nickiwest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Republicans: Cut funding for food assistance programs for poor pregnant women and children!

    Also Republicans: Why aren’t women having as many babies now?

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Wild that they continue to pretend like $100 million is a lot of money, when the President of the United States literally just created a slush fund that’s worth like 20x that.

    With the former going to feeding women and infants in need, and the latter going to violent jan 6 felons.

    They’re accidentally giving the game away. People are starting to put these numbers in perspective and realize every single “we can’t afford that” claim has been utter horse shit

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      "If you’re pre-born, you’re fine; if you’re pre-schooled, you’re fucked. Conservatives don’t give a shit about you until you reach military age. Then they think you are just fine. Just what they’ve been looking for.

      Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers."

      -George Carlin

  • nocturne@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Five Republicans voted against the bill, while Democratic Representatives Donald Davis, Adam Gray, Vicente Gonzalez, and Marie Glusenkamp Perez voted for it, ensuring it passed the chamber.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Let’s just make one big fat headline to list the very few things this government does NOT strip funding for.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    They probably thought they were voting to strip women, infants, and children. As in, make them all naked.