Is there really any value in identifying which places are losing tourism faster than others if the spread is only -65% to -53%? Is there really much of a difference in impact between those two ends?
Also, it would be much more meaningful if there was some info about how much Canadian travelers contribute to a given region’s overall tourism numbers. Just making up some numbers for example, if Canadians make up 10% of Tampa’s tourist traffic but only 4% of Yuma’s, then Tampa is going to be hit harder despite the lower rate of tourism loss.
Is there really any value in identifying which places are losing tourism faster than others if the spread is only -65% to -53%? Is there really much of a difference in impact between those two ends?
Also, it would be much more meaningful if there was some info about how much Canadian travelers contribute to a given region’s overall tourism numbers. Just making up some numbers for example, if Canadians make up 10% of Tampa’s tourist traffic but only 4% of Yuma’s, then Tampa is going to be hit harder despite the lower rate of tourism loss.