RSS Bot@lemmy.bestiver.seMB to Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.seEnglish · 5 days ago16-year-old SATA II SSD survives 1 petabyte of writes, 25x the drive's ratingwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up132arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-link16-year-old SATA II SSD survives 1 petabyte of writes, 25x the drive's ratingwww.tomshardware.comRSS Bot@lemmy.bestiver.seMB to Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.seEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square3fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareadarza@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days agomeanwhile, i’ve seen several nvme oem parts (both qlc and tlc types) in dell and hp systems fail at less than 10 terabytes written.
minus-squareQuadratureSurfer@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoI definitely want to know more about this. Was this in an actual test environment, or could it be caused by a lot more reads/writes than expected due to something like using nvme’s as RAM through page files/swapfile?
meanwhile, i’ve seen several nvme oem parts (both qlc and tlc types) in dell and hp systems fail at less than 10 terabytes written.
I definitely want to know more about this. Was this in an actual test environment, or could it be caused by a lot more reads/writes than expected due to something like using nvme’s as RAM through page files/swapfile?