• Who should get the largest share of criticism society or individuals?

Please be civil in the comment.

  • when@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The problem with lookism is that it takes someone’s appearance as face value and judges based on it which is just prejudice. There’s more to a person than its appearance. Why would someone be mocked for its hair-loss, baldness or facial features?

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Heuristics. You can’t get to know every single person you see, so you make some judgement calls based on the information you have access to, to determine if it’s someone you feel is safe and worth interacting with

      • when@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Heuristics is a good device but it doesn’t work with lookism. For example - Baldness isn’t a conclusive evidence for a person to be considered unsafe or ill natured. We can’t determine everyone’s nature by just their looks. “Looks can be deceiving” is a good phrase.