“When I am speaking about AIPAC, I’m speaking about an organisation that has been supportive of the status quo, that has fought any attempt to actually deliver safety to people, not just in Palestine, but frankly, through much of the region, and it is a status quo for immorality,” Mamdani said on Monday at City Hall.

The mayor noted that more than 1,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed by Israeli forces since a US-brokered “ceasefire” was agreed last October to halt Israel’s genocidal war.

“And when it comes to the way in which they defend the status quo, oftentimes they defend it through direct contributions, as we are seeing right now in New York 13,” said Mamdani, New York City’s first Muslim mayor.

VIDEO: https://www.aljazeera.com/video/newsfeed/2026/6/23/mamdani-defends-aipac-monsters-comment

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pitchfork goes in too easily. Might I offer you one of the fine assortment of rusty spoons in our collection in order to really drag out the agony? We do have other more blunt options as well.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Criticising Israel is widely popular even on the right (barring both the antisemites and MAGA with their delusions to bring Jews into Israel to fulfill their doomsday fantasies).

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Ok I searched it now what

        Edit: he seems like a primo dumb shit. 2 minutes into this video from 7 months ago, he’s saying how Mamdani is gonna kowtow to zionists. When is that gonna happen? Because he’s been pretty solidly antizionist this whole time

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I will support ANY politician that doesn’t want to KILL.

    In short, isn’t THAT the job? Prevent death.

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Generally, the chief objectives of a country are to maintain its borders, protect its people, enforce its monopoly on the use of force and maintain sovereignty over its external politics.

      Protecting its people implies preventing them from death, but there is no direct implication about the death of other people in this purely utilitarian framing.

      However, there is also no justification for attacking other countries and infringing on their borders, harming their people or threatening their sovereignty. In fact, considering that such a war may end up hurting your own people, it seems to me that starting and prosecuting one without necessity (e.g. the need to fulfil your other objectives in absence of less destructive implements of power) contradicts these objectives.

      So basically, yeah, unless necessary to protect their constituents, it would be their job to prevent death. And that’s not even taking morals and human rights into account, nor the charge to represent the will of their constituents in democratic systems.

  • usernametbd@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Good. AIPAC, and really all PACs, should not exist. Israel does not need our aid, they are a rich country. They use our own money from aid to legally bribe politicians to keep giving them our money in aid. It’s bull shit.