“No one, whether you’re trans or not, wants the federal government digging through your identifiable patient information and figuring out what they like and don’t like,” Hack said. “It’s an absolute overreach, and people are really scared.”
Asked whether Hack’s priorities were measures he could support, Platner agreed. “Yes, indeed. They most certainly do,” he said.
If males are superior to females in sports, then trans male athletes are superior to female athletes. From https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2026/03/26/what-makes-an-olympic-athlete-female-the-rules-just-changed-again/
The IOC says that biological males have an advantage in sport, and so the new rule was needed to protect competition in the female division. They claim there is a 10-12% male performance advantage in most running and swimming events, and a more than 20% performance advantage in most throwing and jumping events. And they claim the male advantage can be greater than 100% in events that involve explosive power, like in collision, lifting and punching sports.
The IOC attributes this advantage to men’s greater testosterone. They explain that men experience three significant testosterone peaks: in utero, in infancy and beginning in puberty through adulthood. This gives biological males “larger and stronger skeletal muscle and bone, larger and stronger hearts, larger lung size, more red blood cells, and lower body fat than females,” the IOC explains in their report. This gives men a large advantage in sports, especially those that rely on strength, power or endurance.
Well, this is an excellent example of an independent sports organization using scientific data to make their own determination on what the rules should be around trans athletes. Thank you for admitting I was right, I’m sure that wasn’t easy for you.
Note that the article gave reasons for male athletes having an advantage. This should motivate all sports organizations to ban trans men in women’s sports.
Note that other studies, including meta studies that analyze multiple studies, have concluded that there trans athletes don’t appear to be at an advantage, and that their results are, “low confidence,” meaning their isn’t enough scientific data to make a determination either way. I actually shared the most recent of those studies earlier in this thread, but you ignored it because it didn’t conform to your beliefs. Which isn’t very scientific.
The article specifically listed the reasons which give males an advantage in sports. Explain how these would disappear in trans men.
I’m not qualified to answer that, and neither are you, but I don’t give a shit because it’s a goalpost shift… IOC is looking at one study, while studies that analyze multiple studies indicate there isn’t enough data, but what data there is points to there not being an advantage. I’m also curious as to whether they mean trans women or trans women and cis men when they say, “biological men,” have an advantage, but it’s neither here nor there because A) you’re still cherry picking the data that conforms to your worldview and B) you’ve very clearly conceded the initial argument that the government should be in charge of this. Anyway, you done yet, or do you still want to be wrong at ne a little longer?
The IOC made their decision based on the data. I don’t see how those biological differences can be disputed.