Trump has claimed Reflecting Pool ‘vandals’ could face ‘years in jail.’ By contrast, he’s urged the public to move on from the Epstein files
  • BillyClark@piefed.socialEnglish
    0·
    8 days ago

    You are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

      • BillyClark@piefed.socialEnglish
        0·
        8 days ago

        My statement was not an assertion of provable fact like yours was, but a method for ensuring that people can participate in debates against people who use bad faith tactics like you use.

        I am blocking you after I submit this comment.

        • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
          0·
          7 days ago

          since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

          Coming from null is hilarious, is he genuinely this stupid and dense or just pretending to be a moron?

        • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
          0·
          8 days ago

          Lol alright, since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

          Here’s your positive claim (assertion of provable fact):

          Being a part of an active case is completely separate from being classified.

          Here is your evidence for it: