Noticed some AI evangelists try with the same kind of fake centrism, that was pretty popular during the Gamergate era. In this case, they try to set up people spamming genAI slop against “fanatical anti-AI people”. But just as many loves to pretend moderates are “far-left”, as their past-Gamergate selves pretended Anita Sarkeesian demanded state censorship of sexist videogames, as they are now pretending Hasan Piker is the most radical leftist living today (there are much worse even within the content creator sphere, such as Badempanda) to illustrate the “horseshoe theory”, the table is tilted in favor of AI adoption.
The rational response to LLMs is to replace all the corpo-speak with them (they’re not bad at sounding normal – they’re great at sounding professional, educated and authoritative) so that all the managers get used to writing short bullet points (for the LLMs to generate a text from) and reading short bullet points (summarised by an LLM from the previously generated output), then yank the LLMs out so managers are left communicating with concise notes instead of whatever epithet you wanna use for the current word-vomit.
That’s just about the only reasonable use case I can see: intentionally untraining a detrimental skill nobody should want anyway.