You do realise he talked specifically about crashes that are caused by a feature advertised as self-driving and not every crash ever by a car brand, don’t you?
That comment tries to misrepresent the argument by applying the accusation to every crash involved with the brand, but the comment you quoted correctly brought back the proper context by only applying it to crashes caused by a feature called Full Self Driving. Just because someone tried to sneakily change the context of the conversation, doesn’t make every comment in reply to it must follow that change.
It was prompted by the mention of another crash that was centred around whether FSD was the cause or not. It was a discussion on the fact that Tesla will always claim that their self driving technology is never the one at fault, even in cases where it was clear that it was. Nobody here said all Tesla crashes are caused by the FSD.
Nobody said it was.
ThePantser did:
You do realise he talked specifically about crashes that are caused by a feature advertised as self-driving and not every crash ever by a car brand, don’t you?
You do realize this was a reply to the following comment:
That comment tries to misrepresent the argument by applying the accusation to every crash involved with the brand, but the comment you quoted correctly brought back the proper context by only applying it to crashes caused by a feature called Full Self Driving. Just because someone tried to sneakily change the context of the conversation, doesn’t make every comment in reply to it must follow that change.
But that’s the point. Everyone here is assuming the crash was caused by Full Self Driving just because it was a Tesla.
It was prompted by the mention of another crash that was centred around whether FSD was the cause or not. It was a discussion on the fact that Tesla will always claim that their self driving technology is never the one at fault, even in cases where it was clear that it was. Nobody here said all Tesla crashes are caused by the FSD.