• iocase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    We don’t get a choice

    As long as what you want is what the economic elites want, it happens.

    The correlative factor between what the regular people want and what ends up happening is 0.05. elites are 0.78. business interests are 0.48

    If you want to see change become an oligarch, and if not join a business lobbyist group. If you can’t do either you’re SOL.

  • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    American democracy is an oxymoron. It can’t be ruined if it never existed. FFS the country is run by two Private Companies who have no legal or constitutional reason to be democratic in who they put up as candidates and because this has been the case since the beginning no one else has a chance.

  • the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, the low IQ wing nuts who make up at least 50% of the population who allow people like Trump to become president. They literally ruin anything good we could have a society 😒

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not about age, it’s about corruption. Old politicians have had more time to make deals, forge alliances, and prove themselves useful to money.

    One way to mitigate this is term limits for Congress. Force them out before they can do too much damage, before they can entrench themselves, and gain the support of some billionaire. Less reason to throw millions at a candidate if they’ll be gone in eight years.

  • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s been ruined for a long time, big money interests has always had a stranglehold on it. That tends to be older people sure but not all of them are beyond 30 either.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I had to laugh when “millennial” became shorthand for someone young, LOL. I had to remind someone at one point that Gen Y is now pushing into their 40s, LOL.

          That tween you see doing some dumb shit you disapprove of is no “millennial”. 🤣

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are ruining it, man… Any day now, it will be ruined… Not exactly right now probably, but maybe soon likely… This is a thing that may going to happen probably definitely.

    Consider this a warning… Of a probability… Maybe… Eventually… In theory… I don’t know… Could be.

    • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      sociopathic rich bastards

      I mean they are generally old too, it’s just not their defining characteristic.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, most of them have kids and grandkids, so that money is going to end up in the hands of the young in any case. And they were raised by sociopaths, so the chances that they will be as well is non-zero…

        In any case, when outlets like the NYT do things like this, they know that they are using a red herring…let’s get some inter-generational froth going and people won’t notice who is making off with all the money and power…

        • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s some truth to the inter-generational conflict. A lot of the boomers and early Gen X were granted limited access to the tools of the owner class (eg. “Reverse Mortgages” are really just a tiny version of the same equity financing the ultra-rich use to access their wealth without sacrificing control of their companies or paying taxes). They’ve socially conditioned and co-opted a lot of our elders into protecting their interests for them, however you are correct that it’s more of an attempt to obfuscate the real threat (the sociopathic rich bastards) and keep us fighting with each other rather than organizing against them.

    • almost_genocide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair most old people clutch their pearls when you say radical things like “capitalism is the problem”… so yeah. They’ve ruined a lot of shit.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nah. It’s capitalism and social engineering by the powers that be. That shit is divisive as fuck. The old will be dead soon enough, but that 1% at the top bullshit has gone on for a very long time already. Decades, generations.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The boomers that vote for far right grifters and are happy to pull up the ladder behind themselves certainly deserve a share of the blame too.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not all boomers. Sorry, blaming “boomers” is rather naive.

        I’ve been around long enough to remember boomers blaming all the things on Silent/Greatest Generation. They had all the answers and could not wait to take over.

        Just sayin’ - I’m starting to see a pattern here.

        • almost_genocide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I suggest you try phone banking for an anti-billionaire candidate in a primary election. Your take on Boomers will become informed real fast.

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          The problem with boomers, though, is that they formed such a large voting block that their generation has been able to steer the political system in the US. We started seeing change in the 90s and it was gaining momentum in the early 00s, but the reactionaries went full tilt on fascism as a result.

          This is a gross oversimllified take so please don’t think it’s meant as any kind of scholarly dissertation.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Gen Y is the largest generation right now.

            All of voting age. Followed by Gen Z (not all of voting age - yet), then Gen X, then boomers.

            I mean, what happened in the past as you describe as a result of the huge numbers of boomers is entirely possible. I’m Gen X, so believe it when I say I have my share of resentments about how we were overshadowed nearly our entire lives by boomers, and then the spotlight jumped right to Gen Y, but all because of numbers, and not any unique traits to either Gen Y or boomers or to Gen X.

            But at this point, blaming boomers for what is happening now is rather…interesting, I have to say. They are the 4th largest group.

              • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 hours ago

                In the same vein, you’re all over this thread exclusively shitting on boomers and ignoring all other possibilities.

                Looks like Astro turfing to me.

                • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  How is it astroturfing when boomers hold most of the power in most of the world governments and most of the wealth to boot? Also only tankies care to astroturf on lemmy, there aren’t enough people here to give a shit but propagandists gonna propagandize.

            • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              They have most of the wealth and the power. They’re the ones doing the fascism. Every generation is doing their part on that fucked up front but the buck (literally) starts and stops with the boomers for the most part.

              • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 hours ago

                White people have the most wealth and power.

                City people have the most wealth and power.

                Men have the most wealth and power.

                Non-Indigenous people have the most wealth and power.

              • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Gen Y numbers are bigger right now, as a voting bloc.

                Also, Gen Y is poised to be the richest generation on record: https://fortune.com/2025/03/28/millennials-richest-generation-on-record-great-wealth-transfer-from-baby-boomers/

                I suspect all that wealth transfer may change…something…but I’m not in any way convinced that Gen Y is any better than the boomers, as a group. In fact, they have no real equivalent activism of the 60s generation from what I can tell. In fact, I’m almost certain Gen Y doesn’t have some magical quality that the boomers don’t and that they’ll make things better just by dint of being a different generation with all the wealth and all the numbers…I’d love to be proven wrong, though.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nearly half of boomers have no retirement savings. Blame them all you want, but the problem is the rich. Always has been. Always will be.

  • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem is really simple to solve.

    Politicians represent old people because old people vote. Young people always want to break the system and make a new one, but old people know how to use the existing system to get what they want. .

    Young people have all the power they need to be heard, but they just don’t take it. They think voting changes nothing, but they don’t realize it changes everything.

    If young people voted, politicians would be forced to take their issues seriously.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Young people always want to break the system and make a new one, but old people know how to use the existing system to get what they want

      yeah no. most young people I know dont know jack shit about politics. they’re purely consumers who use TikTok, buy Starbucks and shop on Amazon. Theres nothing breaking the system about them. They don’t vote because of lobbyists who make sure they aren’t represented. When they feel represented they vote.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hot take- people are stupid if theyre just waiting for someone to show up and represent them. No excuse for not doing your civic duty, let alone attempting to fix something that will make your life better.

        Like a dog- you don’t just expect it to do tricks. You have to teach it.

        • Turret3857@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          you don’t just expect it to do tricks. You have to teach it.

          thats the fun part, thats what theyre taught to do at every level of the education system. Its to vote and wait.