• Photonic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s not just about Putin. It’s also about the precedent you create by letting Russia go Scot-free.

    What’s going to stop him from rebuilding his army and doing it again if there are no consequences? What message does it convey to other bad actors?

    • AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      We don’t force enough bad actors to pay reparations. And war criminals get off scot free as long as they’re from a certain set of nations.

      I also agree 100%, and this post is not meant to be a whataboutism. Just because some criminals get away with it doesn’t mean others should.

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        That precedent has already been set decades ago, unfortunately. We do need to address that one too, but that is going to be a much harder challenge.

        But in the meantime, let’s not set any new ones. The world is in a poor enough state as it is.

    • panthera_@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are consequences. He loses all the land he took in the 2022 invasion. The European Alliance will stop future invasions.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What about Taiwan and Cuba? If Russia has basically no externally enforced consequences, China and the US will start looking at their backyards a little differently