• 1 Post
  • 16 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 11th, 2023

help-circle


  • Aedis@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlChina Bad - lemmy liberals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    So what’s the propaganda here? Is there actually not a Uyghur “Situation” according to you? Or is the propaganda that the US and the west also do things like this? Because two wrongs don’t make a right.

    Cause right now I’m in the camp of they all do some truly fucked up shit.

    Edit: gotta love the downvotes with no fucking explanation.






  • Aedis@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldAre you telling me they don't?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    I respectfully disagree with the dead end part of your argument. A dead end would be if they provided no value.

    While the environmental and social downsides are massive negatives on the tech, it is actually doing something.

    Past iterations are completely useless, but more recent iterations show us a more polished side to LLMs that actually do enhance how we do some things.

    Is it worth it? My gut says no, but its both too late and too early to call it. (late in the environmental and societal impact, too early in the tech iteration)

    As far as the “dead end” argument goes, I have to say that’s a hard disagree. Humanity is filled with technological advances that “stand on the shoulders of giants” and improve on previous techs. Even if LLMs themselves don’t prove to be the thing that we’ve been promised by the people driving it, it is taking us one step closer to AGI (whether that’s a good goal or not, that’s still up for debate)

    From here on, I think there’s still quite a bit these models can improve, and I hope a lot of that improvement goes into making it more energy efficient, more water efficient in turn.

    If by a dead end you mean that we can’t reach an AGI from an LLM, I think that’s correct, however an LLM might help us figure out what is needed for an AGI.





  • This reminds me of something I posted a while back as a small ode to time cube:

    It’s entirely plausible that unbeknownst to us ai has developed within a harmonic cube congruency and thus what we assume to be 25 by years ago by our fake queer Greenwich time is actually 25 years in the future for ai following the harmonic influence of the 96 hour day cycle that everyone else is too stupid to notice. Within everything having 4 phases you should be skeptical of those who tell you that time travel isn’t possible for the 4 phases of time itself are forward, backward, up and down, anyone who tells you different is trying to coherce your mind straight into hell by saying the opposite, they are too stuck in their word world to realize that you have moved past that into the real-world.