There is a massive difference between a vibe coder accepting whatever the LLMs writes without understanding any of it and an engineer who understands the codebase and reviews what the LLM produces. Whether the maintainer reviews the output of LLMs rigorously like any random pull request or not, is not verifiable, thus it’s not worth discussing.
Edit:
For clarification, the part I meant by “not worth discussing” is whether the maintainer reviewed the output of the LLM, not the overall discussion of using LLMs for code.
There is a massive difference between a vibe coder accepting whatever the LLMs writes without understanding any of it and an engineer who understands the codebase and reviews what the LLM produces. Whether the maintainer reviews the output of LLMs rigorously like any random pull request or not, is not verifiable, thus it’s not worth discussing.
Edit: For clarification, the part I meant by “not worth discussing” is whether the maintainer reviewed the output of the LLM, not the overall discussion of using LLMs for code.