Perhaps, but most people won’t even use it for quite a while. And AMD may not even do something similar. I don’t think people are going to become dependent on it any more than raytracing which I barely use even with my 5070 Ti.

Not true at all. Have you not seen all the NES emulators that apply anti-aliasing or other modern graphics techniques to old NES games? Completely changes the dev’s vision. You need to disable them.

Or you can just realize that modern devs are working with FSR/DLSS and tweaking it how they want. Just like they been doing with anti-aliasing. They can literally mask portions of the scene so DLSS 5 doesn’t apply to it.

Now, many games they showcased likely didn’t put much effort into tweaking their performance for DLSS 5 since it’s new and they didn’t get the chance, but newer games will use it. It’s not like raytracing and pathtracing just enhance whatever GPU driver devs want it to. The devs can control it.

Do you guys turn your graphics settings to lowest to make sure not to interfere with “artistic vision”? Or do you just not understand the technology at all?

The dev can literally control the vectors for DLSS 5 and test it for themselves until it looks how they like. If you don’t like modifying frames, you should disable all post-processing shaders and most modern anti-aliasing too.

Imagine using the term “Epstein empire” while accusing someone else of being subjected to propaganda. 🤣

Your camera also runs at 4k 60 fps without a GPU. You’re already photorealistic. Are you really stupid or just pretending?

People downvoted for ruining the circlejerk AI hate without bothering to understand the technology. 😩

Not even true. People would think it looks more realistic 10 years ago too.

The scene isn’t the exact same in the demo. Her shoulders aren’t in the same place and environment NPCs are different.

The devs can literally control the vectors used. They can even mask it to not apply to some things. Not sure how it calculates lighting though.

People with low grade hardware are pretty used to their games not looking as advertised.

Lol, another “China good, America bad” post. Classic.

Always followed up with accusations of American/Western indoctrination if you disagree. Bonus points for sinophobia accusation if you say anything bad about China. 🥱

What files? Are you talking about FBI investigative files prior to 2006? How do you even conclude it’s a majority?

Didn’t people complain about the lack of redactions for victims, even though it has now been confirmed, by those who viewed the unredacted files, that many of those redacted victims were trafficking minors and were authors of some of the questionable emails?

Yet when they take them down temporarily to review redactions, people are mad about that too?

People have all the documents backed up already. If they fail to restore any of them, then we’ll know. 🤷‍♂️

Really? Accidental over-disclosure or improper redaction of legal documents only happens in countries “run by tax collecting pedophiles, rapists and war hawks”?

Most of it is duplicative, most likely. But they might as well publish them at this point.

They’re the biggest and most used, and marginally most advanced. Admittedly, Google, Anthropic, and xAI are never really far behind, and sometimes even temporarily get ahead (in model performance). But things are moving fast enough for that to be important. The international AI arms race is very important to the government. They want to make sure the world uses AI (which ingests the world’s data) from American companies instead of Chinese.

They’ve been increasingly losing money. This is mostly because they were growing at a ridiculous rate over the past 3 years. Losing $14 billion is not unexpected. But it’s also not detrimental. Tech companies like this are famous for growing with losses. All it takes is for OpenAI to go public and it’ll become another Tesla, consistently overvalued.

Why wouldn’t another administration bail out the biggest AI company in the world headquartered in the US? They’re literally more important right now than Lockheed, GM, JP Morgan and others they bail out. Trump is probably the only one that would MAYBE consider an alternative like xAI.

It’s not factual. You’re just an idiot typing a single prompt, probably with no agentic loop or curated database to keep it on line. Then you get mad like a caveman wondering why sticks only give fire half the time because you’re not fucking understanding what you’re working with.

Not cancelled. But they may have been flagged internally, I don’t know.

We weren’t violating their terms, only violating their built in model guidelines. American models are usually very sensitive. They’d rather err on the side of blocking content than risk allowing questionable content that is lawful.

But even adjusting prompts, it didn’t yield reliable results. So we have to use uncensored open weights models for many things. It’s not SOTA, but it’s better than nothing.