

The plaintiff has to show the court there’s even a case to begin with.
Yes, and during that process, there is no evidence that is considered. Essentially, the judge takes every claim of wrongdoing at face value, and then determines if there is a law that applies. Basically checking to see if the outcome even matters in the worse case scenario. That works the same for both criminal* and civil cases.
*EDIT: Criminal actually goes to a grand jury and does look at some physical evidence, but only enough to establish probably cause. To over simplify, that the state isn’t completely make stuff up just to harass someone. Not to show guilt, but to show that a crime was even possible to have been committed by the defendant. Like, that an alleged stolen object was actually stolen and that the person was approximately on the correct half of the globe at the time.







And what does that have to do with the price of eggs in China? And regarding the claim in your parenthesis, wrong again. Limitations on how steam keys can be sold through third party vendors is included in their terms of service very explicitly and it is in no way illegal for them to do so. If they are strong arming companies trying to sell games without steam integrations to be the same price as those with the steam integration, well then that would be illegal and the court case is actively determining if that has occurred.