

Yeah, but that’s what they said about the Unabomber.
Obese gray male, introverted, cranky, woke but needs a nap. Enjoys solitude, old movies, long bus rides, and a good bowel movement.
No fascism, no AI, no Substack.
Publishes itsdougholland.com and SeattleSoon.com.


Yeah, but that’s what they said about the Unabomber.


Read the article, to meet a genuine wingnut who ought to be disbarred instead of being AG.


Might tucker out after a few months, but I’ll at least start by checking every bill at the bank and asking for exchanges. “Give me currency without that scumbag’s signature, please.”


I do hope it’s not a competition.


People who don’t necessarily want a public record of their every purchase.


The Guardian is a bit better than average, but this “exclusive” is the same media bullshit seen everywhere — the pretense that Trump is a serious politician with serious thoughts and a serious agenda. He’s not, and the pretense is preposterous.


When a foreign nation drops bombs that kill your family, the proper response is to write a letter to the editor, or perhaps boycott products from the nation that killed everyone you love. I simply can’t understand why this guy didn’t write that letter and announce his boycott. So illogical.


Communism has killed literally BILLIONS of people, while capitalism helps build strong bodies 12 ways!


Fortunately, this will be the only instance of terrorism inspired by the ongoing war in Iran, he said sarcastically.


If your hopes rely on the Democratic Party, all is already lost.


It’s a chance to bring suffering and perhaps death to the weakest and most vulnerable, so there was little doubt how the Republican Supreme Court would rule.


The reporter fucked up, and it was published so Ars Technica fucked up too, but fuck-ups happen. The far bigger fuck-up is that Ars Technica hasn’t covered this story with a fraction of the tenacity they’d show if the fuck-ups had happened at, say, TechCrunch or Gizmodo.


The article doesn’t quite answer the headline’s question, so I will: Why are they prosecuting non-violent protesters? Because cops are cops, so local cops support ICE, and prosecutors are virtually always on the cops’ side. There is no-one in government who actually believes you have a right to peacefully protest, unless you luck into a judge who still has a soul.


Oh, I’m all the evil.


Gosh, another black woman Trump can’t respect. What are the odds!


The news keeps getting better and better! DHS is largely a useless agency, and eliminating these special privileges for “certain people” will give those people a small reminder of reality for the rest of us.


It’s not an argument, and not to be won.


Trump & the Republicans are currently more powerful than people carrying signs. Thus, it’s pointless for people to protest. Is that your point?


sweet jeebers h christ
Saying they got the right guy. (: