

Saw this today, and it feels perfectly appropriate here.



Saw this today, and it feels perfectly appropriate here.



Weird testimonial, but I like it.


Sure, two “perception worlds” but one is informed by research and the other is basically AI psychosis.
You can both-sides this, but it’s like climate change: one side is right and the other is the best funded misinformtion campaign in human history.
ZDL gave you the reasonable answer, backed by facts, but you’re free to disregard that I guess.


For this field trip we solemnly swear to return with 90% of the students.


It doesn’t really matter. The US has been bombing schools for decades, even if an AI chose the target, the humans would have done the same.


Ah but this tech is ahead of the expoiting-their-users-curve.
By using them now you’re opening yourself to psychosis, yes, but also your conversations are being used to further train the models. I do agree we can assume we’re at the high point and these tools are on the same downward slide as all big tech projects. It’s going to happen quickly considering the mind boggling levels of debt they are carrying.


It’s a feature, not a bug.
Sooooo, a machine trained on a rascist dataset outputs rascism, go figure.