Gentle nerd freak of the pacific northwest. All nation states are vermin.

  • 2 Posts
  • 200 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2024

help-circle

  • The Medes were the pre-eminent indo-iranian group for a bunch of the iron age.

    They were integral to the grand alliance that finally brought down the Assyrian Empire, after similar alliances had formed and been defeated. The Median Empire took over huge chunks of the defeated empire and their name was so well known that even in the Persian Wars, the Greeks referred to joining the Persian Empire as Medizing.

    Speaking of, one of the subordinate tribes in the Median Empire’s coalition was a minor regional player that today we call the Persians…



  • I would say these are slightly irritating. Not mildly infuriating in the way that people who use nonsense terms like “eco-fascist” are.

    Anyone sane understands that “be gay do crime” is not inciting criminality but obviously statement of opposition to unjust cultural norms.

    Similarly “killing people makes nature alive” obviously seeks to highlight the current incompatibility of human goals with the needs of all life on the planet (including humans).


  • Ok, firstly i’m not a linguist, or any other kind of expert. I’m an enthusiast, I have an ancient history degree and my parents are linguists. I would also love to hear your take on these questions! :)

    Related to Korean - i think the only honest answer is “there’s insufficient evidence to claim that”. But i do think it’s possible. Like a lot of long-ranger theories it’s like - yeah maybe, but if so further back in time than the comparative method can go. The seimo-turbino related connection to korea is pretty well disproved i believe - the weapons are later and different enough that it’s almost certainly much later chinese iterations moving into korea.

    But i vaguely remember hearing some ancient dna stuff that suggested links. But siberia like the wider steppe seems to be such a soupy interaction zone, i dunno if there’ll ever be evidence enough to puzzle out what’s areal and what’s genetic (linguistically) with certainty.

    As for rooted in siberia, i could believe that there were pre-proto-finno-ugric communities west of the urals who expanded further west in the early bronze age - population expansion likely occurs sometime before linguistic differentiation, right? Since Proto-FU seems younger than Samoyedic it seems likely to me that FU ultimately stems from siberia, even if it developed as a seperate branch west of the urals.

    What’s your understanding though, what do you think about it?




  • Daria Egereva … member of the Selkup indigenous group

    She’s the only one still in jail from a widespread series of arrests of indigenous activists 6 months ago.

    The Selkup speak a Uralic language of the Samoyedic branch. We’re most familiar with the Finno-Ugric branch of Uralic - Finnish, Estonian & Hungarian - the largest non-Indo-European languages in Europe. The homeland of Uralic languages is in Siberia though, where there is a rich diversity of Uralic languages. Uralic languages probably expanded with master bronze-crafters associated with Seima-Turbino complex of bronze weapons, a style we see from China to Finland.

    The first wave of Russia’s eastward expansion, and then especially Stalinism were devastating to the stunning linguistic and cultural diversity of Siberia. Uralic, Turkic, Tungusic (related to northern China’s Manchu of Qing Dynasty fame), even Eskimo languages, plus the fascinating wealth of Paleo-Siberian languages - completely unrelated language families like Chukotko-Kamchatkan, Nivkh, Yukaghir, and the fascinating Yeneseian, which has influenced almost all the others, is preserved in ancient chinese sources and is now a single language with maybe 10-100 speakers. Oh and it’s almost certainly a distant relative of Navajo! For real!

    19thC imperialism and then Stalin’s Russianization policies left most of these languages extinct, moribund or critically endangered. There is a good chance that Putin’s policies will snuff out most of what’s left.








  • leaders still standing in 2030 will be the ones honest enough to put the rehiring cost in the business case before the ink dries on the layoff letter.

    Forbes is always willing to spout transparently fictional business ideology and so often just delusional. It’s really hard to tell when they’re drinking the koolaid and when they’re just selling it.

    In business, leaders don’t disappear for making objectively terrible decisions and no company is ever going to consider firing employees a bad move. If rehiring is needed it’ll be at lower salaries because of a larger job-seeker pool due to all the firings.

    Everyone will agree they all did the right thing and bonuses will be unaffected.