This is the only way to beat the house.

It’s not at all complicated. R&D vote in lockstep for corporate issues. They only differ on policies that affect living voters.

A lot of people seem to think that if you just show them the documents or prove that you’re a citizen this won’t happen.

Aren’t there already cases where holding valid documents has had no effect?

That is the reason Tips won’t disappear.

If Tips were taxed like any other income then there would be less demand and more likely to be included in the wage…

Only When I got to season 3 did I understand why people rave about it. Each season is like an onion layer.

They are worshipped because they were the first in their particular area (neon cyberpunk, Space FX, non-linear storytelling). Each has been improved on by so many other films that the originals pale in comparison.

They are classics, but not timeless.

Now it makes sense why so few British comedies work in the US. The US only knows how to laugh at the hero’s jokes.

Even Wallace and Grommit? It has the best chase sequence captured on film

Or the head of intelligence

Snowden had applied for asylum in Ecuador, he went to Russia for connecting flights to Latin America.

He couldn’t leave. Even the Bolivian presidential plane had to land in Austria after false rumors circulated that Snowden was aboard the aircraft.

exaggeration is acceptable as long as the general idea is true,

Totally disagree. If the goal is to influence someone’s opinion, in any forum, then it will remain their opinion longer if it solidly fact based, without exaggeration.

even hyperbolic exaggeration.

Obvious hyperbolic statements can be very useful. They increase enjoyment for the billions of lemmy readers and make them more receptive.

Conversations don’t stop and wait for you to look up something that ultimately is at best a minor correction

However, in this format that luxury exists.

because it’s not needed and frankly its silly.

It is needed because otherwise it damages the argument.

Constantly moving goal posts in order to discredit a true fact because the way it was presented is not precise.

If you notice, my contributions have not touched any goalposts. Encouraging accuracy is not changing the argument.

Which is what?

Note, I’m not disagreeing with the guy. I’m helping them make better arguments.

If you want to argue scientifically, you have to be precise.

My point stands

But your stats are from your ass.

Self inflicted or spiked?

Natural immunity advocates forget that you need to become ill to obtain it.

Camera is needed for this

An inward facing eye camera is not an issue.

Officer Christy Wasser acknowledged Monday that her camera was off for roughly 11 minutes as officers transported Mangione’s belongings from the McDonald’s to the police station. The gun did not appear until a second search of the backpack — conducted after the body-cam gap.

That’s what it’s there for.

Elon knows it’s too expensive to incorporate lidar data into his product line.