I mean the single cosmetic ad is a problem and I think ads should be illegal, but all of the other signs are attached to their buildings, rather than being an advertisement. So if you’re talking about those, it is not the same.
With the exception of the one, maybe.
I’m sorry, is that supposed to be a comparison of something that’s bad? Can you describe what’s bad about it?
The title of your post is correct, but the body is incorrect.
Stop Killing games are aiming for the wrong thing, but only because they are seeking solutions from capitalism that are caused by capitalism. The million other things that gamers complain about (or pretend to care about sometimes), like micro-transactions, DRM, rushed games, crunch time, and mass developer layoffs are all symptoms of the same root cause. They are seeking remediation completely in conflict with their entire society.
It’s happening in every state. I wouldn’t be so smug.
Michigan Democrat Governor Whitmer disagrees with you.
https://bsky.app/profile/hart28.bsky.social/post/3mnxcoyehj222
deflock is a website specifically for this that uses OSM. I would bet it’s better to do it there.
You are literally just a tasteless AI freak with the comment history to prove it.
When the dogma kicks in, the mask comes off.
You are just doing the thing where you accuse someone else of what you yourself are doing.
Trying to use trans issues to smuggle your hidden actual goal of cheerleading AI is fucking disgusting. You seriously need to go fuck yourself. You are an awful person.
To shitty AI art? Yeah, same, it completely lacks all humanity.
Like it would be really weird to use a picture representing a person looking at a screen and have them not even looking at the screen, for example.
Why edit an AI girl into the picture instead of the original?
It doesn’t even match the art style.
Incredibly bad-faithed from you. I would be extremely disappointed given all your blathering about “quality discourse”, but I knew it was not earnest from the beginning. I will ignore the bad-faithed nature of your examples that MidnightPocket already pointed out.
The context of my question was a discussion of whether admins banning anti-zionist speech was anti-human. You replied to this by stating there is anti-zionism that “some moderators may interpret as targeting jews”. With no commentary and plenty of equivocation, this implies that that is a reasonable assessment in some circumstances. The context was decidedly NOT any of your examples.
Give an explicit circumstance.
Give an explicit, specific example of anti-zionism that can be interpreted as “targeting jews”.
Just to check if you’re at all capable of speaking in good faith, who do you think blew up the Nord Stream Pipeline, and who did you accuse shortly after it happened? Has your opinion on it changed at all?
well now you’ve talked me out of it
Is this a browser? Mobile? If you’re on Android, Morphe or Revanced can do this. But you need to download the manager and patch your own app, or it’s not safe. Do not directly download something claiming to be a patched version of YouTube.
That article is actually a pretty great source on it being a fairy tale. What’s your disagreement? And if you disagree with the Wikipedia article, why are you linking it with no commentary?
No, you are a part of something much bigger than yourself. Again, I’m addressing you as a western liberal. If any part of that is wrong, feel free to correct me. But if you are using the term “whataboutism” and crying about policies in China that you have admitted you have no idea about, then you are pushing western liberal ideals, and are a part of the same problem. Also, I did not mention America at all. If you think what I’m talking about is limited to America, I don’t know. You need to read more.
No, you can’t criticize the Chinese social credit score, because it doesn’t exist.
And it’s not “whataboutism” to tell westerners to stop trying to “fix” other countries while living in a world ruled by pedophile billionaires and pretending they have “freedom”.
Your “solution” to everything is to invade, kill a bunch of innocent people, and install a worse, unelected government. So stop trying to analyze problems with other countries, real or fake. (In this case very fake)
Yeah, and the Big Bad Wolf is bad, but it’s also a western fairy tale.
No, you are assigning a moral value to complexity. Things are not more materially or morally correct by being more complex. That is the thinking of someone who thinks they are smart by really isn’t. Simple truths exist. One of which is that genocide is bad. Adding any “context” to that is pro-genocide. Which Germans have a long history of being.
You all are very high and mighty about the apparent lessons you learned from committing the most complex genocide in history (I can tell you are one of those). But the lesson you all learned is that you need to hire other people to do it. It allows you to maintain your smugness and innocence to anyone who doesn’t pay attention to anything.
Damn, some of their merch is sick