Monument

I thought this sounded familiar.

Twitter collected user phone numbers and email addresses for the stated reason of account verification/security. It then used that data for advertising.

It’s currently banned from profiting from deceptively collected data, is required to allow users to utilize MFA not tied to their phone number, must assess the privacy and security risks of new products, must disclose data breaches to the FCC, and limit employee access to user private information.

Not that a Republican FCC would enforce the rules, but this would make it official that Twitter can do all those things. Expect Musk to be sliming into the DM’s of everyone.

I guess the ‘reasonable’ part of reasonable accommodation is highly subjective.

I just bought a Mac mini for $50 from a local university’s surplus store. I plan to use it as spare hdd space for another device (it came with a 1tb drive), but even being older, it’s still very capable.
Perhaps a similar device could work for you?

Responding with an implied insult is transparent and seems small. It was already fairly dumbed down.

Your defensiveness is getting in the way of understanding my statement. The issue was a lack of faith in your audience.
This isn’t Reddit, and you don’t have to act like that here.

I’ll do you one better. (Well, worse…)

He had $296k CAD in his Shopify/PayPal accounts and sent out these pills to 1,200 people. That’s about $250 CAD / $180 USD / 155 Euro per transaction - minimum, assuming he had not withdrawn funds from those accounts.

Anyone with a welding/industrial supply store nearby could beat him on price without having to ingest anything. Painlessly, too.

I find your comment infuriating and I don’t exactly know why. It feels like you’ve tried to explain things for a less intelligent audience. If someone said that to me, I would struggle to fix my face.

You don’t have to use your first sentence to say that designers design designs, and you don’t have to spend two sentences (“The reasons […] but some are.”) to make a qualifier.

You could just say “Those fucks probably did it on purpose because there’s no law preventing them from it, and they will keep doing it, too”

Errybody knows companies are gonna roll you if they can get away with it.

I appreciate that you stuck with it and worked to figure out what they were talking about - or, well, at least - got them to cross-check such a confidently incorrect statement.

Not the person you’re responding to:

I’ve not heard that before.
Would you elaborate? Is it all genitalia-referencing name calling, or ‘twat’ specifically?

And why?

Well, his metastatic prostate cancer will probably get him before old age.

Would that be druncle, or drunkle?

The ol’ parka boogie.

If it is impossible to quickly find useful information online, we spend more time looking for information.

Many Fediverse users will have adblockers up, but the rest of the population? More time scrolling past advertisements put out by the web’s largest advertising firm and search engine.

I think it’s easier to get down from a goose than a duck.
source

I have had coffee, and I still found myself thinking of this hypothetical sex worker who accepts children as payment.

Are they not able to have their own children?
Is the sex worker Baba Yaga? Does she eat the kids or like, turn them into …

… Oh. Not that kind of transaction. It’s pedophiles.
I would have honestly rather it be witches.

is accused of impregnating a minor while he was in office

Shit, here I thought it was that he escaped from Easter Island.

More UFO documents declassified, this banger of gibberish.

An attempted distraction from his Iran war failures, or are there new Epstein file leaks?

And neither is anyone who decided to run the quote, and now, people who read the quote without the background to know it’s BS.

It’s like the mental lightbulb turning on, but off. People are dumber as a result.

Cool, but realistically, if the federal government even pays out the grants, which is questionable under Trump, given his history, and would require another costly round of litigation to get them to be paid out, how many of those programs exist or exist in such a way that the purpose of the awarded grant can even be fulfilled now?
I could see the government issuing checks, then revoking the grants because the awarded grant was for something timed to 2025 that didn’t happen, relied upon a specific person’s abilities and connections who now has another job, relied upon infrastructure that was sold or repurposed, or used community arrangements that are not in effect anymore.

It takes years and hard work to build something. I hope these programs are resilient, because I fear the ones that don’t have resiliency - likely the ones most desperately needed - are forever damaged or gone.

I bet he leaves those behind because Dennis Feinstein panned “Fresh Kash,” the cologne he created.

(Before anyone thinks I’m confusing Aziz Ansari’s Tom Haverford character from Parks and Rec with Kash Patel, please be assured that I think Kash Patel is confusing Tom Haverford with himself.)

I’ve seen wrinkling like that occur on taller parts with lower infill when the outer shell traps warm/hot air, which distorts the top of the shell as it tries to escape.
If that’s at play here (it doesn’t feel exactly right, though), then as others have suggested, perhaps it’s a cooling fan speed setting?
Any chance your bed is too hot, or some settings like first layer temp/final layer temp are causing unexpected issues? That’s a giant skirt for a large, flat piece. Is the thing tacoing on you?

My other thought on this could be uneven drying of your filament. Perhaps one side is drying to 10%, and the other side is not. Any way to rotate the filament as it’s drying?
How long are you drying for?