Are you trolling or just this ignorant? If you’re referring to the US laws on this, a PIN can’t be required from you. Any biometrics can. So a PIN already protects you from the authorities using their legal route to get into your phone via your compliance.

I’d be interested if they had WiFi calling, RCS, and other basics implemented. Hard to say how true the service is to its claims, but the feature set sounds compelling

Even the premise that LLMs write as good of code as a human today is marketing BS. I work in software, I’ve seen what Claude code does when set loose on our repos already. Its output is unreliable, inefficient, doesn’t meet security standards, and always requires manual intervention to bug-fix. It produces worse code much faster

They are human beings too, and many don’t understand this technology better than the public. It’s easy to fall for the marketing and listen to these chat bots uncritically if you don’t know better

Replicating this on Linux would be as simple as ln -s to make a symbolic link

There is a lot offered on the enterprise side. My company uses GH Actions for CI/CD, uses GitHub for OAUTH, it hosts our git LFS server, and it’s where the slop lovers in the executive and management offices get their copilot fix. That doesn’t cover half of it really, but it’s a lot more than a git forge. I despise it nonetheless and think all of these use cases have better tools available

Damn it’s like they don’t want the system working at all, that’s so convoluted and unnecessary

Proton mail doesn’t require a phone number

If you think an iPhone or Mac aren’t hoovering up your data too, then you’re truly lost on what privacy looks like lmao. Apple slaps “privacy respecting” on all of their data collection and surveillance and people really fall for it. Go ahead and monitor the network activity on a brand new Mac with nothing on it and watch it phone home constantly. Apple devices profile you, they track your every move and application launch, and they publicly admit this.

I find it especially egregious that they’d use that metric as justification when most of these tech companies have internal LLM usage quotas you must hit lest you be reprimanded or fired. So you’re forced to use the tool despite its garbage results, then that very same usage is quoted as reason for losing your job

DuckDNS might be useful idk

This wouldn’t really negate what I’m talking about in terms of their organizational advantages or the argument I’m making about them not just “throwing people” at the problem. But also, I don’t see any evidence that this is true; it seems their hiring strategy is to grab researchers that recently graduated from top Chinese universities as their talent

This is moronic and entirely divorced from the facts. Look at key players in the Chinese LLM space like Deepseek: it’s a tiny team of less than 200 people, building models that rival US tech firms with thousands. They make breakthroughs by pushing research first and intensive planning, rather than brute force. These are immensely innovative and creative teams with a great approach to R&D and engineering above all else

I’ve written open source code and contributed to many projects. I’m more than familiar with the licensing. Some licenses like MIT give permissive rights away to businesses for private use, but copyleft ones like GPL and AGPL families (which are massively popular) absolutely do not, not without all resultant code being open source and GPL as well which is obviously not the case with LLM generated shit. Educate yourself before spewing nonsense please

Open source does not mean royalty free or public domain. Those individual developers who put in that labor have rights as workers, and they express them through their software licenses. It’s absolutely no different than stealing artwork or music for training data, it’s just a different medium of self expression and creativity. Your argument is like saying that since artists have digital catalogues to show off and market their work, they deserve to have it stolen for training data too.

And if the drill was stealing hard work of open source communities and was constantly making fatal but hard to spot errors and telling you the screw is in when it is not

I mean it’s a deeply intimate, trusting, vulnerable thing, and neither party here is directly consenting to sharing or being made to watch. It’s a violation of consent and boundaries, of course it can be traumatic

Why is Rust your problem here? It’s a fantastic language. The issue is licensing

> new yanis varoufakis analysis just dropped

> look inside

> rebrand of left analysis that has existed for a century but with misunderstandings and some crank shit sprinkled in

Seriously though this is fascism, a modern tech flavor but fascism nonetheless. Just as his “technofeudalism” claims were just describing imperialism and neoliberal monopoly capitalism but with his own branding. I’d rather people listen to him than somebody more right wing but this guy is kinda off the mark a lot

That’s why I use UnifiedPush