You should try to read one! Skim it, I mean.

I haven’t read this opinion specifically (and some of this probably won’t apply), but generally:

They explain all of the relevant procedural stuff in detail, and even justifying how things are being handled, with citations. Then the basics about what happened, the arguments on each side. Discuss the relevant laws and relevant edge cases. They will talk about new submissions to the court, and basically tell the story of what happened legally (there was a hearing on x date, defense submitted new evidence on y date etc). Then they sort through all the bullshit as judges, saying what’s accurate/a good argument and what’s not. Then write their actual opinion. 100 pages is pretty standard from the ones I’ve seen.

Yeah I see your point. What I mean is what do they say it’s based on as their legal justification

For anyone else wondering what the ruling was based on (other than trump being a narcissistic loser):

In a 94-page opinion, the judge said the Kennedy Center’s board of trustees, made up of primarily Trump loyalists, violated the 1964 federal law that created the center, arguing the statute makes clear “the Kennedy Center must be named for, and is meant to honor, President Kennedy alone.”

Literally the only reason I remember this person’s name.

If I move, this 👉👉 could die!

The first [of 3 catalysts], were the deaths of five adult males and one adult female - for reasons unknown - in 2014, which could have disrupted social networks and weakened social ties across the subgroups

They assassinated Archmonke Ferdinand!

fairly precise

2000 pound bombs

Only one of these things can be true

Understandable. I get cringe PTSD when I know certain parts are coming up. Still worth it for me, one of my favourite comedies of all time

Recent ones:

Severance

Pluribus

Older one I didn’t see anyone mention yet:

Peep Show (amazing British comedy, truly uncomfortable levels of cringe)

Since you ignored the question I can only assume the answer is yes.

Do you think this justifies depriving millions of people of clean drinking water?

Yeah they chose quite the time to make the perfect the enemy of the good

It also pointed out that the Israeli authorities denied access to 56% of humanitarian aid missions planned for northern Gaza (34 out of 61) and 25% of missions planned for the middle area (28 out of 114) in January. Since 26 January the number of trucks allowed to enter Gaza, an inadequate metric, never exceeded 218 and was typically below 150.

Waiting for the Zionists in the comments to explain how this is all Egypt or Hamas’ fault somehow