I never thought about it and instantly wanted to reply “wait why can’t you do that‽” but now that I thought about it, what would you want the history to look like in that case? A slightly weird rebase? A single commit which seemingly copy pasted the entire other branch with no relation to it left behind?

• by HIDAKA, Rieko

Sadly I do not remember the name of the author anymore, but when I saw this artwork in the National Museum of Modern Art (MOMAT) in Tokyo I just had to save it (also to show some of my artsy friends ^^).

Now obviously this is a digital image of it, but you are not looking at a digital image of a print of a digital image! I.e. all of that was painted, by hand, onto those canvases!

Edit: Added Artist after someone did the obvious and reverse image searched it, thanks by the way!

You may not go outside much but that first picture leads me to believe that when you do you strike gold every time! O.o

Oh I know a place that is/was like this but with tiny (or not so tiny) T-Rex figures due to naming things.

Also no encoded basic auth or raw ip addresses (not that a useful website would likely use raw ipv4 or 6 since that causes huge CORS and sometimes even DNS issues…)

For me, exhaling deeply and holding my breath for as long as possible usually does the trick as well.

Afaik hiccups are mostly caused by some nerve in your neck which is usually responsible for, or at least close to the one actually responsible for, communicating the CO2 concentration of your blood so spiking that somehow interacts and boom! No more hiccup.

Sadly, and I am not a lawyer so this is not even close to legal advice(!!), “beginning” is potentially the wrong word when talking about licenses due to copyright. Because even a single flipped bit in RAM on your computer could be constructed as a copyright infringement if pushed in a legal battle and decided in a court. (This all sounds squishy because, again, I am not a lawyer and as far as I know nothing of this sort has had clear ground setting or breaking rulings yet…)

Why am I of this opinion despite also usually loving to take the “my device my rules stance”? Because I got to proof read some final exams for legal professionals-to-be for their technical accuracy and let me tell you: the most likely legal outcome they saw was not good for most of us. (So now I really really hope that some high up court rules on a case like this and sides with “common sense” about what is and is not allowed with our owned hardware!)