I was expecting the discussion, and the traffic on the blog is mostly irrelevant. But I like to write to organize my own thoughts, and use this as a starting point on the conversation, but feels like I string a bad cord doing this. So I ask you, was this a bad action?
Never thought on the integration with the fedi on this level. But considering that this is a “static” page I don’t even know if I want to push this on the client side.
Also, thanks for the show of faith. I just wanted to discuss the topic with the perspective of people using the game engine, and AI tooling, (local or not), effects benefits and such.
I don’t get it.
You mean because I added in multiple communities?
Or because this is the second post in the Fuck AI from my blog?
Well I can always point to English isn’t my native tongue, so I can always infer stuff that isn’t there :D
Still, the way it explain give the idea of something that I can’t see it. And this is what is concerning me for the last week at least.
That was a fair response. But I get the feeling that a lot of “intelligence” is given in this tool. Feels like they are seeing something that I’m not.
Aren’t you the philosopher? Think about it.
I can give you context if you need, but I’m sure you are smart enough to “think for yourself”
With arguments the whole “ai love” fall to the ground
You can’t see because you don’t know enough on the topic.
“for the topic that I’m not expert, AI is always right”
This looks like a lie to yourself
Read about “the third place”
I’m a Adblock user for so long that I have no ideia what/how the internet is without one. And I always brute force people around me to install one.
The author also forgot that often in th mailing list, rss and such, it’s somewhat expected outside view, similar to a post in th federated media (like this one)
ouch I’ll fix on my morning coffee :)
Yeah… maybe the revision shouldn’t be on the law itself, but on the fact that the economic power can easily translate into law/gov power and this could be a major issue… But this is a total side-step on the topic… And another thing to my already dizzy mind to think about it :D
Gotcha… I think I understand your point. Yet, the lack of enforcement for this law for the small guy, and the dozens of cases of the big guy using this to screw the small guy proves somewhat contrary on it… But I think that we disagree on the philosophical implication on the topic, not on the topic itself.
And before I forget, thanks a lot for clarifying the your point of view, even that we don’t fully agree in totality on the topic, I appreciate your effort and reasoning with me.
I don’t get it them, I’ve strictly said in my blogs, and pages: “do not scrape”, I’ve robots.txt also explicating stating: “do not enter bot”, And yet they scrape my data. Even when it’s clear that this isn’t welcome, so my copyright is already violated, I can get parts of my test from the Gemini and OpenAI, so it’s already in their system.
The copyright is already broken, You are suggesting that I should try to sue them? I don’t follow man… really sorry.
That I’ve logs that prove that some companies are scraping my posts and code when they should not.
Th logs on my blog say otherwise
The logs on my git repository says otherwise too
Since it’s a company, it should not use our data, right? right? It’s my data, it can’t use my post for training, right? It’s not fair use… right?
This is a very sad contradiction that I see in the market right now. The pile of work, the endless list of “Backlog” on the board that never ended, and still firing 8k people because “AI” is doing the work. If the AI is a multiplier of 100x, the backlog could be cleaned before throwing everyone under the bus.