SineSwiper

It’s because they’re not publicly traded

A privately-owned company has better morals by default. Most are also privately-owned because they want to keep their morals.

There’s very few privately-owned companies of this size, and it’s sad.

Hence the “does nothing, still wins” memes.

Too many cooks, too many cooks!

I wonder if the same team saw the success of those two and decided to make a movie.

Say it with me: It’s not age verification; it’s identity collection.

PBS did a recent video on how DNA evidence is not nearly as infallible as copoganda make it out to be.

The interviewer absolutely knew what he was doing.

A headline on c/Science is lying to me and is full of shoddy errors in the study? Here’s my shocked Pikachu face.

Yeah, an overly heightened immune system is how you get allergies and auto-immune diseases.

Is this too good to be true?

This forum in a nutshell.

There has been many, many, many decades of attempts, since the 1920s, at deeply flawed studies to prove some weak link between marijuana use and some bad outcome. Of course, it’s quickly found out that it was using rats, or some other small animal using fucked-up dosage:mass ratios, or the sample size was 20, or they were using the (literally) rotted garbage that was the government-grown marijuana stash, or it was funded by some DARE group, or funded by the nicotine industry, or the alcohol industry, or they didn’t prove causation, or they forgot to factor mental health, or social class, or racial factors, or a thousand other obvious problems.

I’m not going to go around and say cannibus doesn’t have its problems. But, given the track record of obviously flawed studies that land on this forum, and even more so with cannibus research, I’ll default to a position of extreme skeptism until proven otherwise.

Classic case of using cannabis as a scapegoat in a random study to “prove” how harmful it is. Tale as old as time.