Depends on what is defined as “success”. If it’s somewhere within “owning as much wealth as possible”, then yeah.
Depends on what is defined as “success”. If it’s somewhere within “owning as much wealth as possible”, then yeah.
Those “people” are not inside though, they built or exploited the whole railway and happily fly in their own jets, while keeping passangers as hostages and tying as many strangers to rails as they can.
There are people inside too, though.
Well, that’s shitty
Rhetorical: Omg again? With same exact picture? In not really political comm?
(Disclaimer: not US citizen)
Go and vote in primaries for candidates you want, so maybe you get someone decent (so “no matter who” part is eliminated), apply pressure to them right now. Until you have enough power and support to create new party from scratch (and have it catch third of population instantly somehow, including republicans) or overthrow current system altogether, you have to work within it.
Also: in famous thought experiment, named Trolley problem, do you call yourself murderer (genocider) if you decide to push the lever?
I myself had different and conflicted opinions during those years, arguments for voting blue and third party (or abstaining) both look quite convincing, at least for not well versed in politics me. Ugh.
Looking forward to mod award on this post.


Continuing on “there’s not something there”, what about theater analogy to llm’s? Usually people know it’s all act, but if actors play too good, you immerse. And it’s focus is not the truth, it tells the story.
I guess that was about post titke.