

Historical employment patterns which depend on labour being a smaller but irreplaceable slice of a larger pie. 0% of an economy a billion times the current size is still 0$


Historical employment patterns which depend on labour being a smaller but irreplaceable slice of a larger pie. 0% of an economy a billion times the current size is still 0$


“Why AI will not replace labour”
Looks inside
Baseless assertion that some tasks always require humans input
Every fucking time.


I mean the man is right. I am much more expensive to maintain than the theoretical “Ummdustry-equivalant processor” (UEP). plus I have a lower duty cycle, am less convinient to employ/dismiss and lack scalability. That’s why I’m terrified of being replaced (economically) by it.
I love the idea that homeownerships is this great stabalising force on your psyche


Agree with the problem… not sure how this failure mode is similar to that of the hindenburg. Titanic, “the unsinkable ship”, might be more appropriate.
It’s like the matrix, but reverse.
I was going to suggest Darth Vader in purgatory pod-racing all the children he killed into heaven.