

Man, Woody Harrelson really let himself go, huh


Doesn’t do what archive.today does, unfortunately. This article wouldn’t be available in wayback.


Not good, for sure. Sucks that there’s no working alternative. It’s trivial to not participate in the DDoS at least. uBO blocks it by default.


That doesn’t mention any Russian narrative. They altered a page as part of their personal grudge with that blogger. The same blog targeted in the DDoS attack.


The entire administration is made up of ridiculously insecure men flexing to themselves in the mirror.


“The United States is decimating the radical Iranian regime’s military in a way the world has never seen before,”
he said, masturbating furiously.
Can someone please make this creep take a cold shower before doing these briefings?


Yeah, we definitely need a replacement for archive.today. If anything, though, you’d think it not being spammed by wikipedians would improve performance.
I think in this case the NYT might have changed something specifically to make it fail. It’s working for other sites and it’s failing in a really strange way. It starts archiving, gets part way through, then it fails and kicks it back to the archive queue. It just loops like that for maybe 15 minutes before giving that weird ‘doesn’t exist (yet?)’ error.


Okay archive.today is just dead set on being completely useless today. The main link is a gift link now.


Your mom’s an undisclosed bot.
I posted this before archive today was finished, just removing “/wip” from the url but archive today failed. It’s been dogshit for the past few days for some reason. Generating a new link now and I’ll update it when it’s done. Thanks for letting me know it was broken.


My bad. Sometimes I forget that the Mayor of News has decreed there shall only be ONE HEADLINE and that any attempt at knowledge outside of the official bumper sticker is strictly forbidden.


It’s not primarily to do with Israel, which is what headlines are about. A headline about Israel invading would be misleading. You’d expect an article about Israel invading and not one about the Lebanese government’s efforts to disentangle itself from Hezbollah.
Why are you even arguing this? You didn’t read the article. You incorrectly assumed it was about something it isn’t. Like, those amateur NYT editors just haven’t stumbled upon the brilliant headline writing method of making shit up without reading anything? What are you talking about.


The article is about the internal politics of Lebanon.


This isn’t an article about Israel invading a country.
“Israel” appears in the article 27 times (once in the post body, even!), including this sentence that also includes “invaded”:
Israeli forces have also invaded and seized parts of southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah militants have engaged them in clashes over the past two days.


Unless the goal is to help Peter Thiel demolish the remainder of the free press, paying those men millions in libel lawsuit money would be more stupid than brave.


The craziest thing, that isn’t actually mentioned in the article, is that not a single person out of 23 voted to indict. Not one.


The case of the posthumous video games:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/epstein-fortnite/
The official @FortniteStatus X account, responding to another user, posted (archived) on Feb. 6 that a user changed their name to littlestjeff1 after the name surfaced in the Epstein files, saying in part, “Hey Official Fortnite here - this was a ruse by a Fortnite player. A few days ago, an existing Fortnite account owner changed their username from something totally unrelated to littlestjeff1, following the revelation of littlestjeff1 as a name on YouTube.”
The post also said none of Epstein’s email addresses listed in the public-facing case files exist in the game’s account system.
The case of the day-before-email:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2026/02/10/epstein-press-release-aug-10/
From a DOJ spokesperson:
Official statements regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein were edited and circulated over several email chains within the Southern District of New York beginning August 10, 2019. While initial drafts of the statement list the previous date, this was merely an unfortunate typo that was later updated to reflect the correct date before being publicized. Any suggestion that the Department drafted a statement in advance of Jeffrey Epstein’s death is false.
Also:
Searches for the Aug. 10 news release revealed correspondence between FBI staff on Aug. 10 about what appeared to be the finished news release that Biase sent. Searches of the DOJ’s database did not reveal records of DOJ, U.S. attorney’s office or FBI staff discussing the versions of the news release dated Aug. 9, suggesting it wasn’t circulated internally or externally in the DOJ before Epstein’s death.
Historically, the relationship between the US and Israel is far closer than others in the region. Everyone else are much more like fair weather friends. Intelligence between the two is highly integrated to a degree unseen outside of the closest US allies.